Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 13;10:17130. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74170-1

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Parent–child’s physiological synchrony predicts fear learning in children, only for the parent cue. (a) Example of the z-scored phasic skin conductance for a parent and his/her child during the whole observational learning stage. (b) Cross-recurrence plot obtained from the same parent–child dyad. (c) Physiological synchrony between children and parents during the observational learning stage successfully predicted the fear response in children for the first CS + Parent presentation during direct expression test. Physiological synchrony between children and parents did not predict the fear response for neither the CS + Stranger (d), nor the CS − (e).