Table 4.
Population | TPMa | M ratio |
---|---|---|
STES | 0.984 | 0.961 |
CARMG | 0.884 | 0.877 |
CAPES | 1.000 | 0.947 |
MTMG | 0.461 | 1.045 |
DESRJ | 0.995 | 0.878 |
SMARJ | 0.188 | 0.767 |
NFLRJ | 0.973 | 0.914 |
NFRJ | 0.161 | 1.117 |
MPPR | 0.947 | 0.934 |
IBIMG-fla | 0.527 | 0.648 |
IBIMG-flo | 0.326 | 0.989 |
IBIMG-ceu | 0.884 | 0.999 |
TERJ-co | 0.385 | 1.029 |
TERJ-fla | 1.000 | 1.065 |
GARJ | 0.903 | 0.850 |
MFSP | 0.995 | 0.860 |
PARJ | 0.784 | 0.781 |
PISP | 0.787 | 0.835 |
SSSP | 0.918 | 0.695 |
PGSP-fla | 0.994 | 0.885 |
PGSP-sp | 0.064 | 0.822 |
ATISP | 0.539 | 0.632 |
BESP | 0.918 | 0.772 |
JURSP | 0.813 | 0.994 |
MCPR | 0.988 | 0.749 |
aSignificant value for P < 0.05.
A population is considered to have undergone a bottleneck if its M-ratio value falls below the threshold of the critical M ratio (Mc = 0.771). In bold are populations in which bottlenecks were detected according to Garza and Williamson (2001).