Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 27;125(5):353–370. doi: 10.1038/s41437-020-0342-8

Table 4.

Bottleneck probability test results (TPM: two-phase mutation model) and M-ratio values based on ten nuclear microsatellite loci.

Population TPMa M ratio
STES 0.984 0.961
CARMG 0.884 0.877
CAPES 1.000 0.947
MTMG 0.461 1.045
DESRJ 0.995 0.878
SMARJ 0.188 0.767
NFLRJ 0.973 0.914
NFRJ 0.161 1.117
MPPR 0.947 0.934
IBIMG-fla 0.527 0.648
IBIMG-flo 0.326 0.989
IBIMG-ceu 0.884 0.999
TERJ-co 0.385 1.029
TERJ-fla 1.000 1.065
GARJ 0.903 0.850
MFSP 0.995 0.860
PARJ 0.784 0.781
PISP 0.787 0.835
SSSP 0.918 0.695
PGSP-fla 0.994 0.885
PGSP-sp 0.064 0.822
ATISP 0.539 0.632
BESP 0.918 0.772
JURSP 0.813 0.994
MCPR 0.988 0.749

aSignificant value for P < 0.05.

A population is considered to have undergone a bottleneck if its M-ratio value falls below the threshold of the critical M ratio (Mc = 0.771). In bold are populations in which bottlenecks were detected according to Garza and Williamson (2001).