Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 11;9(9):1274. doi: 10.3390/foods9091274

Table 2.

Microbiological characteristics of organic and conventional lettuce samples.

Log (CFU/g)
Production
Mode
Sample Enterobacteria Total Counts Lactic Acid Bacteria Pseudomonas Spp. Molds Yeasts
Conventional Conv1 6.5 8.0 3.4 7.7 4.3 6.0
Conv2 4.3 8.3 4.2 7.4 4.6 7.2
Conv3 7.1 7.8 3.4 1 4.5 5.3
Conv4 4.9 8.0 3.2 6.4 4.8 5.6
Conv5 5.1 8.3 7.3 7.3 5.2 5.9
Conv6 7.0 8.9 3.9 7.4 5.1 5.5
Conv7 4.9 8.5 * 7.0 4.4 7.1
Conv8 6.4 9.2 4.2 7.1 4.2 6.4
Conv9 6.0 9.2 4.0 6.6 5.4 7.0
Conv10 6.8 7.8 1.0 6.1 4.9 5.8
Average ± SD 5.9 ± 1.0 b 8.4 ± 0.54 3.8 ± 1.6 6.4 ± 2.0 4.7 ± 0.41 6.2 ± 0.7
Organic Org1 4.7 7.8 3.4 7.6 3.4 4.3
Org2 <1 7.2 3.5 3.7 4.6 5.2
Org3 6.4 7.5 2.7 7.5 5.4 6.1
Org4 3.0 7.4 1.0 7.2 4.9 9.2
Org5 4.1 6.1 1.0 6.0 2.2 4.5
a Org6 7.5 8.9 3.3 7.3 5.5 6.3
a Org7 4.3 7.4 3.6 6.6 5.0 5.6
a Org8 6.7 7.4 3.3 6.9 5.3 6.3
Org9 6.1 8.0 * 7.4 4.5 6.7
Org10 6.9 8.1 1.0 6.8 5.4 6.4
Average ± SD 5.2 ± 1.5 b 7.6 ± 0.72 2.5 ± 1.2 6.7 ± 1.2 4.6 ± 1.1 6.1 ± 1.4

a Purchased in farmers’markets; *: not determined; SD: standard deviation; b average values for the total counts on organic and conventional lettuce samples were significantly different (p < 0.05). For all the samples, the counts of L. monocytogenes and E. coli were below the detection limit of the enumeration technique (1.0 × 101 CFU/g). Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes were not detected in any sample.