Skip to main content
Innate Immunity logoLink to Innate Immunity
. 2020 Jun 14;26(7):549–564. doi: 10.1177/1753425920928388

In utero inflammatory challenge induces an early activation of the hepatic innate immune response in late gestation fetal sheep

Miguel A Zarate 1,, Stephanie R Wesolowski 1, Leanna M Nguyen 1, Robyn K De Dios 1, Randall B Wilkening 1, Paul J Rozance 1, Clyde J Wright 1
PMCID: PMC7556190  PMID: 32538259

Abstract

Chorioamnionitis is associated with inflammatory end-organ damage in the fetus. Tissues in direct contact with amniotic fluid drive a pro-inflammatory response and contribute to this injury. However, due to a lack of direct contact with the amniotic fluid, the liver contribution to this response has not been fully characterized. Given its role as an immunologic organ, we hypothesized that the fetal liver would demonstrate an early innate immune response to an in utero inflammatory challenge. Fetal sheep (131 ± 1 d gestation) demonstrated metabolic acidosis and high cortisol and norepinephrine values within 5 h of exposure to intra-amniotic LPS. Likewise, expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines increased significantly at 1 and 5 h of exposure. This was associated with NF-κB activation, by inhibitory protein IκBα degradation, and nuclear translocation of NF-κB subunits (p65/p50). Corroborating these findings, LPS exposure significantly increased pro-inflammatory innate immune gene expression in fetal sheep hepatic macrophages in vitro. Thus, an in utero inflammatory challenge induces an early hepatic innate immune response with systemic metabolic and stress responses. Within the fetal liver, hepatic macrophages respond robustly to LPS exposure. Our results demonstrate that the fetal hepatic innate immune response must be considered when developing therapeutic approaches to attenuate end-organ injury associated with in utero inflammation.

Keywords: Chorioamnionitis, fetus, innate immunity, liver, macrophages

Introduction

Chorioamnionitis accounts for high morbidity and mortality rates of the fetus and neonate, and is associated with premature birth and infection-induced disorders.15 Infection-induced inflammation is thought to underlie many of the complications associated with exposure to inflammatory stress in utero such as brain damage,6 bronchopulmonary dysplasia,7 and necrotizing enterocolitis.8 The fetal response to an inflammatory challenge is characterized by an accumulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the amniotic fluid (local) and the umbilical blood (systemic).913

Reports have demonstrated that the fetal innate immune system contributes to the inflammatory response to an intra-amniotic (IA) immune challenge. IA exposure to LPS, a TLR4 agonist, is a well-established model used to study the fetal response to a pro-inflammatory stimulus.14,15 It has been shown previously that direct LPS exposure to the fetal skin,16 gut,17 respiratory epithelium,18,19 and placenta results in a local pro-inflammatory response.20 These findings support the hypothesis that the epithelial surfaces that are in contact with the amniotic fluid drive the inflammatory innate immune response.

It is increasingly recognized that the liver functions as a primary immune organ during early stages of development.21,22 Hepatic macrophages, particularly, are uniquely positioned to initiate the innate immune response to systemic insult due to their unique location outside the sinusoidal space. Here, hepatic macrophages are able to capture pathogens and antigens in the bloodstream,2325 and send signals to other organs through the production of cytokines released systemically.26 Surprisingly, there are no data to support the hypothesis that the fetal liver contributes to the fetal innate immune response to IA LPS challenge. Specifically, previous studies have demonstrated that, starting at 5 h following IA LPS challenge, hepatic expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines is not increased in the preterm lamb.27 However, by 2 d after exposure to IA LPS, the liver does show evidence of injury through activation of acute-phase proteins,28 and polymorphonuclear immune cell aggregation in preterm babies.29 Thus, the immediate fetal hepatic response to an IA inflammatory challenge is relatively understudied and leaves us with little knowledge on how the fetal liver, and, specifically, the hepatic macrophages respond to a pro-inflammatory innate immune challenge.

To understand whether the liver contributes to the systemic inflammatory response, a better characterization of the temporal relationship between IA LPS exposure and the fetal response is necessary. Precise determination of the systemic response to LPS at time points immediately following IA exposure would increase our understanding of the fetal response to IA LPS challenge, and thus guide interrogation of the hepatic response. Without this information, therapeutic approaches to manipulate key components that might trigger and regulate the response to chorioamnionitis, and, thus, minimize the injury associated with infection-induced inflammation are limited.

Our research group has a well-established chronic catheterization fetal sheep model that allows us to monitor local and systemic fetal responses at different time points.30,31 Likewise, our model can provide sufficient liver cell populations to measure the cell-specific contribution to multiple challenges in vitro.32,33 A better understanding of the fetal-organ-specific innate immune response to inflammatory stimuli can provide novel insights into the development of the innate immune response and its role on the pathophysiology of end-organ injury in the perinatal period. The aim of the present study was, therefore, to determine the effects of an IA LPS challenge on the early (1 and 5 h) fetal hepatic innate immune signaling and transcriptional response. We hypothesized that the fetal liver contributes uniquely to the early activation of the innate immune signaling after an in utero pro-inflammatory challenge in the sheep.

Materials and methods

Fetal surgical preparation

A total of 13 pregnant late-gestation Columbia-Rambouillet mixed-breed ewes (singleton pregnancies) were obtained from Nebeker Ranch (Lancaster, CA, USA), housed, and had access to food and water ad libitum. Fetal surgery was performed at 125 ± 1 d of gestation. Briefly, ewes were fasted 24 h before surgery and received a pre-operative dose of antibiotics (penicillin, 600,000 U IM) and non-steroidal analgesic (flunixin meglumine, 1 mg/kg). Anesthesia was induced through the administration of ketamine (20 mg/kg) and diazepam (0.2 mg/kg), and maintained with 1–3% isoflurane during the entire procedure. Our fetal chronic catheterization model has been published elsewhere.32,34 Briefly, at surgery, the fetus was exposed by maternal laparotomy and hysterectomy, and a set of catheters was placed in the fetus (umbilical vein and abdominal aorta), the amniotic fluid space, and in the ewe (femoral vein and artery) (Table 1). Ampicillin (500 mg) was injected into the amniotic space before closing the uterus. All catheters exited the right flank of the ewe subcutaneously and were placed into a disposable pouch. Ewes had at least 6 d of post-operatory care, where they received 2 d of treatment with flunixin meglumine (2.2 mg/kg) and probiotics (10 g orally), and their health status and food/water intake were monitored constantly.

Table 1.

Catheters placement and their purpose in our fetal ovine inflammatory challenge model.

Origin Catheter placement Purpose
Fetal
Abdominal aorta Fetal systemic condition assessment
Umbilical vein LPS quantification
Maternal
Femoral artery Maternal systemic condition assessment

Experimental sheep model of chorioamnionitis

Figure 1 depicts our experimental design through and the administration of IA LPS. Ewes (131 ± 1 d of gestation) were allocated into two groups according to the time after IA LPS exposure (LPS 1 h, n = 5; LPS 5 h, n = 8). Animals used for this study were conscious and freestanding during the experiment. Escherichia coli O55:B5 LPS (L2637, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) diluted in sterile PBS (1×, 2 ml) was administered (20 mg) in the intra-amniotic space. Fetal arterial blood samples (1 ml) were collected in heparinized tubes before (two baselines), and 1 h and 5 h (LPS 5 h group) or 15, 30, and 60 min (LPS 1 h group) post-IA LPS exposure. We measured blood gases values with the ABL 800 Flex blood gas analyzer (Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark), Glc and lactate with the Yellow Springs Instrument model 2900 Select Biochemistry Analyzer (Yellow Springs Instruments, Yellow Springs, OH, USA), plasma norepinephrine by HPLC (model no. 2475; Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA), and plasma cortisol by an ovine-specific ELISA assay (Alpco Diagnostics, Windham, NH, USA). Experiments were terminated after 1 or 5 h of IA LPS exposure. At this point, ewes received a dose of diazepam (0.2 mg/kg) and ketamine (20 mg/kg) IV, fetuses were delivered by laparotomy and hysterectomy, and both ewes and fetuses were euthanized with an IV overdose of sodium pentobarbital (Fatal Plus; Bortech Pharmaceuticals, Dearborn, MI, USA). Fetal organs were dissected, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Experimental IA LPS design and timeline. After surgery, ewes (131 ± 1 d) were allocated into two groups according to the time after IA LPS exposure (LPS 1 hr, n=5; LPS 5 hrs, n=8). BL: baseline measurements.

RNA extraction and quantitative real time-PCR

We used the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) to extract mRNA from LPS-exposed fetal liver (1 h, n = 5; 5 h, n = 7), lung (1 h, n = 5; 5 h, n = 7), cotyledon (1 h, n = 5; 5 h, n = 8), skin (1 h, n = 5), and control tissues (liver, lung, and cotyledons, n = 4; skin n = 3) (CON) that were subjected to the same instrumentalization except for IA LPS administration. mRNA was converted into cDNA using the Verso cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Primers were designed on the Ovis aries genomes for SYBR green, and included IL-1α (IL1A), IL-1β (IL1B), IL-6 (IL6), and IL-8 (IL8), and TNF-α (TNF) (Table 2). We used the ovine reference gene 40S ribosomal protein S15 (RPS15) to normalize RT-qPCR results, as previously described.35 cDNA samples (20 ng) and 5 μM of each primer were assayed in duplicate using FastStart Essential DNA Green Master Kit (Roche, Pleasanton, CA, USA) in a Lightcycler 96 (Roche, Pleasanton, CA, USA). RT-qPCR conditions were as follows: 95°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of amplification at 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 30 s; and melting curve from 60°C to 95°C. Data are expressed as a fold change relative to the mean in the CON group based on absolute values by using standard curve calculations of pooled cDNA as described previously.36

Table 2.

Primers used for real-time qPCR analyses.

Gene symbol Gene name Forward primer Reverse primer Probe
18S 18S Ribosomal RNA GATCCATTGGAGGGCAAGTCT GCAGCAACTTTAATATACGCTATTGG SYBR Green
CD11B Integrin Subunit Alpha M TTTCCGGCTGCTGGCCTGTG ACTCTCTGAGGGCCGCTGGG SYBR Green
IL1A Interleukin 1 alpha GATGACCTGGAAGCCATTGC ATGTGCTGATCTGGGCTTGAT SYBR Green
IL1B Interleukin 1 beta ACGAACATGTCTTCCGTGAT ACCAGGGATTTTTGCTCTCT SYBR Green
IL6 Interleukin 6 ACCTGGACTTCCTCCAGAAC TTGAGGACTGCATCTTCTCC SYBR Green
IL8 Interleukin 8 ATGAGTACAGAACTTCGA TCATGGATCTTGCTTCTC SYBR Green
PEPCK Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase TGTCCGAGGAGGATTTTGAG ATGCCAATCTTGGACAGAGG SYBR Green
RPS15 40S Ribosomal protein S15 ATCATTCTGCCCGACATGGTG CGGGCCGGCCATGCTTTACG SYBR Green
TNF Tumor necrosis factor CTGGGCAGGTCTACTTTGGG GAAGGGGATGAGGAGGGTCT SYBR Green

Hepatic and pulmonary nuclear and cytoplasmic protein extraction

LPS-exposed fetal liver (1 h, n = 5; 5 h, n = 4) lung (1 h, n = 4; 5 h, n = 4), and control tissues (n = 4) (CON) were homogenized using the Bullet Blender (Next Advance, Troy, NY, USA), and protein lysates were collected and kept in T-PER buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific). Fetal hepatic cytosolic and nuclear extracts were prepared with the NE-PER kit (ThermoFisher Scientific).

Western blot analysis

Both LPS and CON cytosolic and nuclear extracts were electrophoresed on a 4–12% polyacrylamide gel (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and proteins were transferred to an Immobilon-P membrane (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA) and blotted with Abs against the NF-κB subunits p50 (1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA, Cat. no. ab32360, RRID: AB_776748) and p65 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA, Cat. no. #6956, RRID: AB_10828935), and NFκB inhibitory protein IκBα (1:1000, Cell Signaling, Cat. no. #4814, RRID: AB_390781). All Abs used in this study were incubated at 4°C overnight. For loading controls in our assays, we used β-actin (1:1000, Cell Signaling, Cat. no. #3700, RRID: AB_2242334) for cytosolic extracts; and lamin B (1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA, Cat. no. SC-6217, RRID: AB_648158) for nuclear extracts. Immunoblots were imaged with the Li-Cor Odyssey® Fc imaging system (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA) and densitometric analysis was conducted using Image Studio version 4.0 (Li-Cor).

Plasma 3-hydroxytetradecanoic acid detection

3-Hydroxytetradecanoic acid is the most common fatty acid part of lipid A, the lipid component of the LPS innermost region, and responsible for the toxicity of Gram-negative bacteria.37 We had enough remaining plasma from three critical time points (baseline, 15 min post-LPS exposure, 30 min post-LPS exposure) from four fetuses to test for 3-hydroxytetradecanoic acid levels. Plasma samples collected from the umbilical vein were base hydrolyzed and extracted, and the extracts were analyzed using LC-MS/MS performed on a Waters Acquity M-Class UPLC coupled to a Waters Xevo TQ-S triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters Corp.) using the methods reported by Pais de Barros et al.38 Peak areas of 3-hydroxytetradecanoic acid were detected and integration of peak area was performed manually using Masslynx (Waters Corp.). Total 3-hydroxytetradecanoic acid peak areas detected were the sum of the free (after hydrolysis) and bound (intact) LPS forms.

Primary hepatocyte and hepatic macrophage cell culture studies

Primary hepatocytes and hepatic macrophages were isolated from normal late gestation fetal sheep using previously described methods.30,39 Briefly, a portion of the right lobe of the fetal liver was perfused and digested with collagenase. Hepatocytes were separated from the total mixture of digested cells by centrifugation at 100 g. Hepatocytes were plated in complete DMEM medium with 1.1 mM Glc supplement with 2 mM glutamine, 2.2 mM lactate, 1 mM pyruvate, 1× non-essential amino acids, 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin, 1 nM insulin, 100 nM dexamethasone, and 10% FBS on collagen coated Primaria (BD Falcon) plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After a 4 h attachment period, cells were washed, and the medium was replaced with serum-free DMEM plus 0.2% BSA (SF). For hepatic macrophage isolations, the supernatant after centrifugation at 100 g containing all non-parenchymal cells was filtered and spun at 800 g to pellet non-parenchymal cells. Cells were resuspended in 24% Histodenz (Sigma-Aldrich) and gradients were prepared and spun at 1500 g for 20 min. Cells at the interface were collected, washed, and plated on tissue culture plates in complete DMEM with 55 μM 2-mercaptoethanol. Both cell types were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2. After 1–2 h attachment, non-adherent cells were aspirated and media was replaced on adherent cells, representing hepatic macrophages.40 Both cell types were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2. Hepatocytes incubated in SF media and hepatic macrophages incubated in complete medium with 2-mercaptoethanol were studied 24 h after isolation. A total of four isolated cell groups (hepatocytes and hepatic macrophages) were incubated with SF media (basal) or LPS (100 ng/ml) for 3 h of treatment and then harvested for RNA isolation and gene expression. Purity assessment was performed by measuring gene expression of the hepatocyte (phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, PEPCK) and hepatic macrophage (integrin subunit alpha M, CD11B) fractions (Table 2). Gene expression was normalized to 18s ribosomal RNA (18S) and the RT-qPCR conditions were the same as described in the section RNA extraction and quantitative real time-PCR. Results were expressed relative to the average basal expression in hepatocytes from the cell preparations.

Statistical analyses

We used the Mixed or NPAR1WAY Procedure of SAS/STAT 9.3® (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) for data analysis. For blood gas, endocrine, western blot, and ELISA data, the statistical analysis involved a one-way ANOVA with repeated measures (baseline, 1 h, and 5 h post exposure). Appropriate covariance structures were used by selecting the best fit statistics. Cell culture data RT-qPCR was analyzed as one-way ANOVA with four treatments (hepatocytes ± LPS, hepatic macrophages ± LPS). Differences between means were obtained using the Fisher’s least significant difference test. Hepatic WB and RT-qPCR data values failed to follow the normal distribution and thus were analyzed by the Mann–Whitney U nonparametric test. Significance was declared at P < 0.05.

Results

IA LPS challenge induces systemic inflammatory stress in the fetus within 5 h of exposure

First, we sought to determine the time course whereby IA LPS challenge produced a systemic response in the fetus. Most reports describe metabolic alterations such as acidosis, hyperlactatemia, and hypoglycemia from a period starting at 6 h to d after exposure in LPS-exposed fetuses,41 neonates,42,43 and adults,44,45 but the early timing of this acute response in the fetus is not yet elucidated. Due to the lack of sufficient data describing the initial effects of IA LPS in utero, we measured the fetal systemic response at 1- and 5-h post-exposure to confirm whether an IA LPS challenge produced a similar systemic metabolic feature in an earlier time course. We determined fetal blood gases chemistry, Glc, and lactate parameters in the maternal and fetal abdominal aorta at early time points (0–5 h, Table 3). An acute inflammatory challenge produced a significant decrease in fetal pH and an increase in pCO2 values in the fetal abdominal aorta at 5 h compared with baseline (P < 0.05). Furthermore, IA LPS-challenged fetuses showed a marked reduction in plasma bicarbonate levels in the abdominal aorta at 5 h after exposure (P < 0.05). Plasma lactate concentrations showed an approximate 5-fold increase in IA LPS exposed fetuses compared with control (P < 0.001). Although Glc has been reported to increase during LPS challenges in adults,46 there were no differences in maternal/fetal plasma Glc levels at these acute time points. Furthermore, we did not detect changes in maternal pH, pCO2, bicarbonate, or oxygen content values after LPS challenge.

Table 3.

Maternal and fetal artery blood gas and metabolite values at baseline, and 1- and 5 h post intra-amniotic LPS (IA LPS) administration (n = 8). Data are shown as means ± SEM. Asterisks (*) indicate statistical difference (P < 0.05) vs. baseline.

pH (units) pCO2 (mmHg) HCO3 (mmol/l) O2 content (mmol/l) Glc (mg/dl) Lactate (mmol/l)
Maternal values: (Femoral artery)
 Baseline 7.46 ± 0.02 35.7 ± 1.5 24.6 ± 1.5 5.5 ± 0.3 65.6 ± 2.9 0.69 ± 0.90
 1 h 7.46 ± 0.02 37.8 ± 1.5 26.4 ± 1.5 5.6 ± 0.4 65.1 ± 3.0 0.73 ± 0.94
 5 h 7.48 ± 0.02 35.9 ± 1.5 25.7 ± 1.5 5.7 ± 0.4 60.2 ± 2.9 1.57 ± 0.90
Fetal values: (Abdominal aorta)
 Baseline 7.37 ± 0.02 52.8 ± 1.5 29.0 ± 1.4 3.1 ± 0.3 16.8 ± 2.9 2.24 ± 0.90
 1 h 7.34 ± 0.02 55.6 ± 1.6 28.9 ± 1.5 2.6 ± 0.4 17.8 ± 3.1 2.21 ± 0.99
 5 h 7.25 ± 0.02* 57.6 ± 1.5* 24.3 ± 1.4* 2.4 ± 0.3 15.2 ± 2.9 9.21 ± 0.90*

IA LPS challenge activates fetal stress responses characterized by an increase in cortisol and norepinephrine levels

Once we observed acute fetal metabolic acidosis as a response to IA LPS, we then determined whether IA LPS activates systemic fetal neuroendocrine stress responses. IA LPS-challenged fetuses (Figure 2) showed a significant increase in plasma norepinephrine and cortisol levels at 5 h post stimulus compared with baseline (P < 0.01). This suggests IA LPS activates robust and acute stress responses along with acidemia in the fetus.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

IA LPS activates fetal stress responses systemically. Fetal abdominal aorta plasma (A) norepinephrine (pg/ml) and (B) cortisol (ng/ml) were measured at baseline, and 1 and 5 hours post IA LPS challenge (n=8). Data are shown as means ± SEM. Asterisks (*) indicate statistical difference (P < 0.05) vs. baseline.

IA LPS challenge activates the fetal innate immune response in the liver at 1 and 5 h post exposure

The acute and early effects of IA LPS on the fetal innate immune response have not been fully described. To test this, we determined the effects of LPS on the fetal lungs, cotyledons (fetal placental side), and skin since these tissues have shown to produce inflammatory responses as a consequence of an IA LPS exposure.16,47,48 Furthermore, we decided to study the fetal liver since it has been reported to contribute to the innate immune response after an inflammatory stimulation in the perinatal period,49 and harbor a unique type of macrophage cells that have a pro-inflammatory phenotype due to their condition as sentinels in the fetal bloodstream.22,50 First, we assessed the expression of primary innate immune response genes (TNF, IL1A, and IL1B)51 at 1 h post IA LPS. Figure 3 shows the IA LPS effects on the fetal liver, lung, placenta, and skin innate immune gene expression at 1 h post stimulus. IA LPS-exposed fetuses showed a significant up-regulation of hepatic primary immune response genes (Figure 3a) at 1 h compared with control (P < 0.05). The fetal lung and skin showed a significant up-regulation of IL1B (Figure 3b and 3d) at 1 h vs. control, with no differences in the expression of IL1A and TNF. There were no differences in the expression of tested genes observed in the fetal cotyledon exposed to IA LPS (Figure 3c). We then decided to determine whether these transcriptomic effects continue at 5 h post IA LPS exposure. IA LPS produced a significant up-regulation of hepatic (Figure 4a) IL1A (P < 0.05), IL1B (P < 0.05), TNF (P < 0.05), IL6 (P < 0.05) and IL8 (P < 0.05), and a significant increase in expression of IL1A (P < 0.05) and IL6 (P < 0.01) (Figure 4b) in the lung compared with control. In contrast, IA LPS did not produce any gene expression changes in the placenta innate immune response profile transcriptome (Figure 4c). These results demonstrate that the fetal hepatic innate immune response is both rapid and robust in response to an IA inflammatory challenge.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Fetal innate immune transcriptomic response to IA LPS at 1 hour after IA LPS. (A) Liver, (B) lung, (C) placenta, and (D) skin gene expression levels for innate immune response markers at 1-hour post IA LPS (n=5) (LPS) vs. control (n=4; skin n=3) (CON) groups. Ovine RPS15 was used as a reference gene. Values are represented as fold change compared with CON based on absolute values. Asterisks (*) indicate statistical difference (P < 0.05) vs. CON by the Mann-Whitney test.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Fetal innate immune transcriptomic response to IA LPS at 5 hours after IA LPS. (A) Liver (n=7), (B) lung (n=7), and (C) placenta (n=8) gene expression levels for innate immune response markers between 5-hour post IA LPS (LPS) vs. control (n=4) (CON) groups. Ovine RPS15 was used as a reference gene. Values are represented as fold change compared with CON based on absolute values. Asterisks (*) indicate statistical difference (P < 0.05) vs. CON by the Mann-Whitney test.

IA LPS-induced hepatic and pulmonary pro-inflammatory cytokine are associated with NF-κB activation

The transcription factor NF-κB is intrinsic among all living species and has a key role in the response to various infectious stimuli.52,53 It is well recognized that this transcription factor regulates the expression of many pro-inflammatory genes downstream of LPS-mediated TLR4 signaling.53 Following LPS exposure, NF-κB dimer pairs (e.g., p50 and p65) are translocated to the nucleus due to degradation of the cytosolic inhibitory protein IκBα.52,54 Based on this, we decided to evaluate whether IA LPS induced changes in the levels of the cytosolic protein levels of the NF-κB inhibitory protein, IκBα and whether it induced nuclear translocation of the NF-κB subunits p65 and p50 in target organs that demonstrated up-regulation of key pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Figure 5 indicates the hepatic (Figure 5a–d) and pulmonary (5e–f) cytosolic IκBα and nuclear p65/p50 protein levels in fetuses exposed to IA LPS compared with a control group at 1 h and 5 h. Hepatic cytosolic IκBα protein levels decreased significantly 1 h after exposure (P < 0.05) and showed no difference vs. control at 5 h. Hepatic nuclear NF-κB subunits p65 and p50 showed a similar pattern with an increase in protein expression at 1 h post IA LPS (P < 0.05) and returned to control values 5 h after exposure.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

IA LPS induces NFκB activation in the fetal liver and lungs. (A, B) Representative Western Blot images showing hepatic (A, B) and pulmonary (E) cytosolic IκBα and nuclear NFκB subunits p65 and p65 at 1 hr and 5 hrs post IA LPS exposure compared with control (0 hrs). Actin and lamin b were used as loading controls for the cytosolic and nuclear extracts, respectively. Densitometry ratio to control (n=4) (0 hrs) of hepatic (C, D) and pulmonary (F) cytosolic IκBα and nuclear NFκB subunits p65 and p50 following LPS exposure at 1 hr (n=5) and 5 hrs (n=4). Asterisks (*) indicate statistical difference (P < 0.05) vs. control (0 hrs) by the Mann Whitney test.

Fetal lung cytosolic IκBα protein expression showed a similar significant reduction at 1 h post IA LPS (P < 0.05) along with an increase in nuclear p65 protein expression (P < 0.05), with both values returning to control levels 5 h after. There were no differences observed in the nuclear p50 levels in the lung. These results demonstrated that the fetal liver is capable of mounting a robust NF-κB-mediated innate immune response activation as early as 1 h post IA LPS.

3-Hydroxytetradecanoic acid can be detected in the fetal circulation after IA LPS challenge

Having observed a systemic (blood gases and endocrine) and local (hepatic innate immune activation) fetal response to an IA LPS exposure, we hypothesized that this is a consequence of LPS presence the fetal circulation. For this, we sought to detect fetal systemic 3-hydroxytetradecanoic acid (main metabolite from E. coli LPS) levels from the umbilical blood at earlier time points (15- and 30-min post exposure). Figure 6 shows the fetal plasma 3-hydroxytetradecanoic acid integrated peak intensities from four LPS 1-h animals at different time points. We found that two animals showed a raise in 3-hydroxytetradecanoic acid intensity peaks at 15 min post IA LPS, with values returning to basal levels 30 min post exposure. Similarly, in a third animal, intensity rose at 15 min post IA LPS, but, rather than decreasing at 30 min, the intensity continued to rise. Finally, the last fetus started with higher 3-hydroxytetradecanoic acid intensity peaks in the umbilical vein before IA LPS (0 min). While the reason for this is not clear, one possibility is subclinical infection. These data indicate that intact E. coli LPS or its main metabolite (3-hydroxytetradecanoic acid) can be detected systemically in the fetus as early as 15 min following an IA exposure.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Fetal plasma 3-hydroxytetradecanoic acid integrated peak intensities after IA LPS exposure. 3 umbilical vein plasma samples per animal (baseline, 15 and 30 minutes; total = 12 samples) were base hydrolyzed and extracted using LC-MS/MS. Each color represents a different fetus exposed to IA LPS. Values are represented as average peak values normalized to the lowest peak. Peak quantification was used by the method described in Pais de Barros et al.

Endotoxin challenge activates fetal hepatic macrophages in vitro

Having determined that an IA LPS exposure induces a robust innate immune response in the fetal liver, we next sought to determine whether there was a particular hepatic cell type responsible for this activation. Hepatic macrophages have been described as pro-inflammatory, with high phagocytic and cytokine producing activity due to their location inside the sinusoid space and their direct contact with the fetal circulation.25,50 Likewise, human hepatocyte cell lines have been shown to initiate and amplify acute inflammatory response when stimulated.55 However, the acute innate immune response activation of fetal hepatocytes and/or hepatic macrophages have never been described. We collected fetal hepatocytes and hepatic macrophages from control animals and exposed them to LPS (100 ng/ml, 3 h) or basal media and measured the gene expression levels for innate immune response markers in vitro (Figure 7). Importantly, LPS exposure induced significant up-regulation of pro-inflammatory innate immune response markers (IL1A, IL1B, TNF, IL6, and IL8) in fetal hepatocytes and hepatic macrophages. Of note, LPS-induced pro-inflammatory gene expression was significantly higher in hepatic macrophages when compared with fetal hepatocytes. These results demonstrate that both the fetal hepatocyte and the fetal hepatic macrophage respond to LPS-exposure by up-regulating pro-inflammatory gene expression. Furthermore, the fetal hepatic macrophage mounts a more robust innate immune transcriptional response to LPS exposure when compared with similarly exposed hepatocytes.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

LPS exposure activates pro-inflammatory cytokine gene responses in fetal hepatocytes and hepatic macrophages in-vitro. Cell cultures (n=4) were exposed to serum-free DMEM plus 0.2% BSA media (Basal) or LPS (100 ng/ml) for 3 hrs. 18S was used as a reference gene. Values are represented as fold change (mean) compared with Basal Hepatocytes based on absolute values. P < 0.05 vs. Basal Hepatocytes (*) and LPS Hepatocytes (#).

Discussion

The present work aimed to evaluate the acute fetal response to inflammatory challenge (IA LPS), with main focus on the fetal hepatic innate immune response. Our study found that a single dose of IA LPS caused acute physiologic systemic disturbances within 5 h of exposure. This observation led us to interrogate the fetal innate immune response within this early time frame. We found that the fetus was able to mount an early and robust pro-inflammatory innate immune response, with the most activation noted in the liver and with some activation in the fetal lung and skin, all starting within 1 h of exposure. Furthermore, the early LPS-induced hepatic NF-κB activation contributes to this response. We also observed that hepatic macrophages isolated from fetal sheep respond robustly to LPS exposure, providing evidence that this cell might contribute to the fetal innate immune response. This study shows for the first time three major and unique findings when fetuses are exposed to an IA inflammatory challenge (IA LPS): 1) the late gestation fetus is capable of producing an early and systemic innate immune response, 2) the fetal liver contributes to the activation of the NFκB-mediated innate immune signaling, and 3) the fetal hepatic macrophages are able to mount a robust innate immune response when exposed to LPS in vitro.

Our study focused specifically on measuring the contribution of the hepatic early innate immune response as well as the systemic effects after an in utero pro-inflammatory challenge. We reasoned that taking advantage of our chronic catheterization model and early time point measurements would provide a better assessment of physiological data as well as interorgan and intervascular innate immune crosstalk coming from multiple tissue beds. We found that, systemically, IA LPS induced fetal metabolic acidosis and hyperlactatemia at 5 h post exposure. These findings are consistent with previous reports demonstrating metabolic disturbances in the fetus exposed to IA LPS. Several reports describe a rise in lactate and CO2 values hours after an inflammatory stimulus in fetuses and neonates.42,5658 Fetal acidemia might have occurred in response to IA LPS due to a partial reduction in placental perfusion,42,58 or alterations in the fetal metabolic activity after the inflammatory insult.57 Fetal Glc and oxygen values were not impaired after IA LPS exposure, due possibly to a maintained nutrient supply to fetal tissues,57,59 or to an acidemia-dependent effect on the fetal hemodynamic response by increasing blood pressure or heart rate demonstrated in other studies.58,60

Likewise, we found that IA LPS induced the activation of fetal stress responses characterized by an increase in circulating plasma cortisol and norepinephrine. Studies have shown a rise in cortisol and norepinephrine hormone concentrations after LPS administration in adult models of endotoxemia.6163 However, the effects of IA LPS on fetuses have not been fully elucidated. Our results are supported by the work of Nitsos et al., who described an acute mild increase in cortisol concentrations in younger fetuses (∼120 gestational d) exposed to IA LPS.57 Our data shows higher cortisol values, and this might have occurred due to the older age of our fetuses when exposed to IA LPS since hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity is reported to increase towards the end of gestation due to a reduction in negative feedback sensitivity.64 While different studies have characterized the localized and systemic fetal inflammation following exposure to IA inflammatory challenge, very little data exist on the acute hepatic innate immune response.

This study shows that IA LPS exposure produced a unique robust activation of the hepatic innate immune transcriptomic machinery (IL1A, IL1B, and TNF) starting at 1 h post exposure with a lesser extent at 5 h. The pro-inflammatory response was also observed with less intensity in fetal lung at 1 h (IL1B) and 5 h (IL1A, IL6, and IL8) post IA LPS, and in fetal skin (IL1B) 1 h after challenge. Likewise, activation of the fetal hepatic and pulmonary innate immune response to IA LPS involves NF-κB-signaling. We observed LPS-induced cytosolic NF-κB inhibitory protein IκBα and the nuclear accumulation of the transcriptionally active subunits p65 (liver and lung) and p50 (liver). Although previous studies have described the fetal innate immune system as naive and limited,6567 our main findings in this study indicate an opposite perspective. Our data demonstrate that the fetal liver contributes to the early innate immune response to IA LPS through the activation of NF-κB signaling. Previous reports did not observe any hepatic innate immune response activation to IA LPS,27 or describe any degree of hepatic inflammation and injury,29,68 in fetuses exposed to an inflammatory challenge. However, these latter studies either focused on the hepatic response d or wk after exposure and after preterm delivery,27,29 or did not address/observe changes in the transcriptional machinery response.68,69 Our findings provide a critical relevance to the scientific field since the association between the early fetal hepatic immune response to an in utero inflammatory challenge has been poorly described. The presence of active and robust NF-κB-mediated perinatal hepatic innate immune response responses to LPS is supported by our previous findings. We observed that, in neonatal (P0) mice, intraperitoneal (IP) LPS induced a robust hepatic innate immune response activation characterized by an early up-regulation of pro-inflammatory genes,49,70 and degradation of cytosolic NF-κB inhibitory proteins IκBα and IκBβ.49 Furthermore, we found that the fetal lung and skin showed an early activation of the innate immune signaling after IA LPS exposure, although not as robust as the fetal liver when compared with their respective controls. Fetal lung and skin innate immune activation after IA LPS is supported by Kemp et al., who reported up-regulation of pulmonary IL1B and IL8 genes,18 and high IL-8 concentrations in alveolar lavage,47 after IA LPS exposure. Likewise, Kemp et al. described that the skin and chorion respond to IA LPS by recruiting immune cells and up-regulating inflammatory cytokines in the fetus and preterm lamb.16,71 Although some reports have suggested the possible role of the placenta in the up-regulation of pro-inflammatory genes and immune cells infiltration in clinical and experimental models of chorioamnionitis,41,7275, we did not observe a placental immune response activation. It is possible that placental innate immune response to IA LPS might occur at later time points, as previously indicated by different groups.14,41,72

We next determined the role of the main two hepatic cell populations in the innate immune response to an inflammatory challenge. Our results showed that both the fetal hepatocyte and hepatic macrophage demonstrate a rapid innate immune response to LPS in vitro. Late gestation fetal hepatic macrophages have been reported to be prone to an M1 type phenotype due to their condition as sentinels in the bloodstream,24,25 and their high peroxidase and phagocytic activity.25,76 In our study, isolated and cultured fetal hepatic macrophages exposed to LPS in vitro produced a robust up-regulation of innate immune response markers (IL1A, IL1B, TNF, IL6, and IL8). We have previously reported that LPS-stimulated hepatic macrophages are able to produce strong inflammatory responses through the expression of COX-2,49 and MCP1 and IP10.70,77 Although we found that the hepatic macrophage innate immune response to LPS in vitro is early and robust, fetal hepatocytes also showed similar activation to a lesser extent. Therefore, the hepatic innate immune response to an inflammatory challenge might be regulated by activation of both main liver cell populations. Future work should be focused on manipulating the activation of these cells to ameliorate the local and systemic pro-inflammatory effects in fetuses and neonates when exposed to different inflammatory stimuli.

The exact mechanism of how IA LPS can produce an early hepatic innate immune response activation and fetal metabolic acidosis and stress remains to be determined. Our findings indicate that the hepatic innate immune transcriptomic machinery is highly up-regulated at 1 h post IA LPS exposure, which occurred earlier than the activation of the HPA axis or the development of fetal acidosis (5 h post IA LPS). We can then infer that these two systemic events might be a consequence of an early innate immune signaling, and likely involves NF-κB activation. The HPA axis activity can be exacerbated by the action of cytokines,78,79 and, thus, induce fetal hemodynamic modifications that might increase the production of lactate in some vascular areas, leading to metabolic acidosis.58,60

In this study, we could not determine what activates the hepatic innate immune response in fetuses exposed to IA LPS. Besides LPS, NF-κB-mediated activation of hepatic macrophages can be induced by primary response cytokines,80,81 which are secreted by other organs, as well as damage-associated molecular patterns such as lipid peroxidation and mitochondrial DNA produced by oxidative stress (TLR9-mediated NF-κB activation).82,83 As a matter of fact, the current dogma indicates that IA LPS cannot reach the fetal circulation at any time point.27 However, we believe that IA LPS might reach the systemic circulation by direct contact and absorption (skin),16 swallowing (lungs),19 or by portal circulation due to fenestration of the fetal gut (liver).84 In an attempt to address this, we sought to detect LPS in fetal plasma at earlier time points (baseline, and 15 and 30 min after exposure). We measured 3-hydroxytetradecanoic acid, the most abundant component of the lipid A in E. coli, by LC-MS/MS. Importantly, 3-hydroxytetradecanoic acid detected by LC-MS/MS consists of both the free (detoxified LPS) and bound (intact LPS) forms. The origin of 3-hydroxytetradecanoic acid free form comes from hydrolysis of intact, and systemic presence of this metabolite has previously been shown to result from liver-resident macrophages processing of circulating systemic LPS.85 Furthermore, hepatic macrophage-mediated LPS detoxification can release up to 40% of the lipid component (free 3-hydroxytetradecanoic acid) that could be detected by LC-MS/MS. Plasma samples were collected from the umbilical vein since it provides the central circulation of the fetus and indicates the systemic distribution of a intravascular substances.86,87 In this study, we were able to detect 3-hydroxytetradecanoic acid (free or bound form) in the fetal circulation as early as 15 min after IA exposure. These data appear in contrast to those previously published by Kallapur et al., where LPS could not be detected in the peripheral blood of pre-term lambs after IA exposure.28 However, the method for detection was not noted in that study. Furthermore, we tested umbilical vein plasma samples at earlier time points (15 and 30 min) to avoid missing LPS uptake and clearance by hepatocytes,88 hepatic macrophages,89 and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells.90 In adult animals, hepatic clearance of systemic LPS is known to be extremely rapid, and has been reported to occur as early as 5 min after exposure of IP LPS in rats.88 In total, all fetuses showed detectable levels of LPS metabolite, and three fetuses showed an increase in 3-hydroxytetradecanoic acid peak intensities 15 min after exposure. While these data are limited to four animals, by using highly sensitive techniques (LC-MS/MS) in plasma samples at early time points, we were able to detect the presence of circulating LPS metabolites in all animals. These unique data provide novel insights to systemic fetal exposure to LPS following IA exposure, and provide the premise for developing therapeutic approaches to reduce potential local and systemic damage. However, our results are mostly descriptive and future studies are needed to confirm our findings in detecting LPS systemically minutes after IA exposure and to determine the percentage of LPS crossing the fetal circulation from the amniotic fluid compartment in different animal models. Furthermore, chorioamnionitis is the most important cause for pre-term birth since it is inversely correlated with gestational age.9193 Since the role of the fetal liver during an inflammatory challenge is not fully understood, this study focused on establishing the basis of how the hepatic innate immune system responds to IA LPS in late gestation fetuses. However, our findings might not be applicable for antenatal infections that occur in early gestational ages. Therefore, future studies targeting the liver as a primary immune organ in fetuses exposed to inflammatory stimuli at different developmental time points will provide great insights in understanding the development of chorioamnionitis. Likewise, reports indicate that the degree of the innate immune response to infection can be sex-specific.94,95 Unfortunately, we did not have sufficient power to study the sex effects on the hepatic innate immune response to IA LPS, but determining its contribution can be relevant to study the immune function at later developmental time points.

To conclude, this study has demonstrated that an inflammatory challenge (IA LPS) induces the activation of fetal systemic (HPA axis and metabolic acidosis) and early NF-κB-mediated hepatic innate immune responses. Furthermore, the fetal hepatic macrophages mainly activate a robust pro-inflammatory response when exposed to LPS in vitro. For the first time, this work provides compelling evidence that the fetal liver is an active immune organ with the ability of inducing an early and robust innate immune response activation to an in utero inflammatory challenge. Understanding the mechanisms of how the activation of the fetal hepatic innate immune response is associated with systemic blood gas and stress disturbances has yet to be determined. Interventional studies should aim to over-activate or inhibit the hepatic innate immune response to assess the fetal systemic effects as well as the immune activation of other peripheral organs, which will bring novel insights for the development of better therapeutic approaches to the compromised fetus/neonate during sepsis.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Eileen Chang, David Caprio, Dan LoTurco, Gates Roe, and Larry Toft for their technical assistance in the development of this project.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health grants R01-HL132941 (CJW), R01-HL132941-02S1 (MAZ), R01-DK088139 (PJR), and R01-HD093701 (PJR).

Statement of ethics

All procedures were approved by the University of Colorado Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (101924) and performed in compliance with the United States Department of Agriculture and the American Association for Accreditation for Laboratory Animal Care at the Perinatal Research Center at the University of Colorado School of Medicine (Aurora, CO, USA).

ORCID iD

Miguel A Zarate https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2389-2892

References

  • 1.Hofer N, Kothari R, Morris N, et al. The fetal inflammatory response syndrome is a risk factor for morbidity in preterm neonates. Am J Obst Gynecol 2013; 209: 542.e1–542.e11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Urakubo A, Jarskog LF, Lieberman JA, et al. Prenatal exposure to maternal infection alters cytokine expression in the placenta, amniotic fluid, and fetal brain. Schizophr Res 2001; 47: 27–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet 2012; 379: 2151–2161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Been JV, Rours IG, Kornelisse RF, et al. Histologic chorioamnionitis, fetal involvement, and antenatal steroids: effects on neonatal outcome in preterm infants. Am J Obst Gynecol 2009; 201: 587.e1–587.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Leviton A, Dammann O. Coagulation, inflammation, and the risk of neonatal white matter damage. Pediatr Res 2004; 55: 541–545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Paton MCB, McDonald CA, Allison BJ, et al. Perinatal brain injury as a consequence of preterm birth and intrauterine inflammation: designing targeted stem cell therapies. Front Neurosci 2017; 11: 200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Watterberg KL, Demers LM, Scott SM, et al. Chorioamnionitis and early lung inflammation in infants in whom bronchopulmonary dysplasia develops. Pediatrics 1996; 97: 210–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Elimian A, Verma U, Beneck D, et al. Histologic chorioamnionitis, antenatal steroids, and perinatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96: 333–336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Holst RM, Laurini R, Jacobsson B, et al. Expression of cytokines and chemokines in cervical and amniotic fluid: relationship to histological chorioamnionitis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007; 20: 885–893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Saji F, Samejima Y, Kamiura S, et al. Cytokine production in chorioamnionitis. J Reprod Immunol 2000; 47: 185–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dollner H, Vatten L, Halgunset J, et al. Histologic chorioamnionitis and umbilical serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and cytokine inhibitors. BJOG 2002; 109: 534–539. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yanowitz TD, Jordan JA, Gilmour CH, et al. Hemodynamic disturbances in premature infants born after chorioamnionitis: association with cord blood cytokine concentrations. Pediatr Res 2002; 51: 310–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shalak LF, Laptook AR, Jafri HS, et al. Clinical chorioamnionitis, elevated cytokines, and brain injury in term infants. Pediatrics 2002; 110: 673–680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Berry CA, Nitsos I, Hillman NH, et al. Interleukin-1 in lipopolysaccharide induced chorioamnionitis in the fetal sheep. Reprod Sci 2011; 18: 1092–1102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Collins JJ, Kuypers E, Nitsos I, et al. LPS-induced chorioamnionitis and antenatal corticosteroids modulate Shh signaling in the ovine fetal lung. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2012; 303: L778–L787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kemp MW, Saito M, Nitsos I, et al. Exposure to in utero lipopolysaccharide induces inflammation in the fetal ovine skin. Reprod Sci 2011; 18: 88–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wolfs TG, Kramer BW, Thuijls G, et al. Chorioamnionitis-induced fetal gut injury is mediated by direct gut exposure of inflammatory mediators or by lung inflammation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2014; 306: G382–G393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kemp MW, Kannan PS, Saito M, et al. Selective exposure of the fetal lung and skin/amnion (but not gastro-intestinal tract) to LPS elicits acute systemic inflammation in fetal sheep. PloS one 2013; 8: e63355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Maneenil G, Kemp MW, Kannan PS, et al. Oral, nasal and pharyngeal exposure to lipopolysaccharide causes a fetal inflammatory response in sheep. PloS one 2015; 10: e0119281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dowling O, Chatterjee PK, Gupta M, et al. Magnesium sulfate reduces bacterial LPS-induced inflammation at the maternal-fetal interface. Placenta 2012; 33: 392–398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gale RP. Development of the immune system in human fetal liver. Thymus 1987; 10: 45–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Naito M, Hasegawa G, Takahashi K. Development, differentiation, and maturation of Kupffer cells. Microsc Res Tech 1997; 39: 350–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mebius RE, Miyamoto T, Christensen J, et al. The fetal liver counterpart of adult common lymphoid progenitors gives rise to all lymphoid lineages, CD45+CD4+CD3- cells, as well as macrophages. J Immunol 2001; 166: 6593–6601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Naito M, Hasegawa G, Ebe Y, et al. Differentiation and function of Kupffer cells. Med Electron Microsc 2004; 37: 16–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Naito M, Takahashi K, Nishikawa S. Development, differentiation, and maturation of macrophages in the fetal mouse liver. J Leukoc Biol 1990; 48: 27–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sheth K, Bankey P. The liver as an immune organ. Curr Opin Crit Care 2001; 7: 99–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kallapur SG, Willet KE, Jobe AH, et al. Intra-amniotic endotoxin: chorioamnionitis precedes lung maturation in preterm lambs. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2001; 280: L527– L536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kallapur SG, Jobe AH, Ball MK, et al. Pulmonary and systemic endotoxin tolerance in preterm fetal sheep exposed to chorioamnionitis. J Immunol 2007; 179: 8491–8499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bieghs V, Vlassaks E, Custers A, et al. Chorioamnionitis induced hepatic inflammation and disturbed lipid metabolism in fetal sheep. Pediatr Res 2010; 68: 466–472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thorn SR, Brown LD, Rozance PJ, et al. Increased hepatic glucose production in fetal sheep with intrauterine growth restriction is not suppressed by insulin. Diabetes 2013; 62: 65–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brown LD, Davis M, Wai S, et al. Chronically increased amino acids improve insulin secretion, pancreatic vascularity, and islet size in growth-restricted fetal sheep. Endocrinology 2016; 157: 3788–3799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Culpepper C, Wesolowski SR, Benjamin J, et al. Chronic anemic hypoxemia increases plasma glucagon and hepatic PCK1 mRNA in late-gestation fetal sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2016; 311: R200–R208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Brown LD, Kohn JR, Rozance PJ, et al. Exogenous amino acids suppress glucose oxidation and potentiate hepatic glucose production in late gestation fetal sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2017; 312: R654–R663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Limesand SW, Hay WW., Jr. Adaptation of ovine fetal pancreatic insulin secretion to chronic hypoglycaemia and euglycaemic correction. J Physiol 2003; 547: 95–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Limesand SW, Rozance PJ, Smith D, et al. Increased insulin sensitivity and maintenance of glucose utilization rates in fetal sheep with placental insufficiency and intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2007; 293: E1716–E1725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Thorn SR, Regnault TR, Brown LD, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction increases fetal hepatic gluconeogenic capacity and reduces messenger ribonucleic acid translation initiation and nutrient sensing in fetal liver and skeletal muscle. Endocrinology 2009; 150: 3021–3030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rietschel ET, Wollenweber HW, Russa R, et al. Concepts of the chemical structure of lipid A. Rev Infect Dis 1984; 6: 432–438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pais de Barros JP, Gautier T, Sali W, et al. Quantitative lipopolysaccharide analysis using HPLC/MS/MS and its combination with the limulus amebocyte lysate assay. J Lipid Res 2015; 56: 1363–1369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Thorn SR, Baquero KC, Newsom SA, et al. Early life exposure to maternal insulin resistance has persistent effects on hepatic NAFLD in juvenile nonhuman primates. Diabetes 2014; 63: 2702–2713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nnalue NA, Shnyra A, Hultenby K, et al. Salmonella choleraesuis and Salmonella typhimurium associated with liver cells after intravenous inoculation of rats are localized mainly in Kupffer cells and multiply intracellularly. Infect Immun 1992; 60: 2758–2768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Grigsby PL, Hirst JJ, Scheerlinck JP, et al. Fetal responses to maternal and intra-amniotic lipopolysaccharide administration in sheep. Biol Reprod 2003; 68: 1695–1702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Duncan JR, Cock ML, Scheerlinck JP, et al. White matter injury after repeated endotoxin exposure in the preterm ovine fetus. Pediatr Res 2002; 52: 941–949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lavoie JP, Madigan JE, Cullor JS, et al. Haemodynamic, pathological, haematological and behavioural changes during endotoxin infusion in equine neonates. Equine Vet J 1990; 22: 23–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Michaeli B, Martinez A, Revelly JP, et al. Effects of endotoxin on lactate metabolism in humans. Crit Care 2012; 16: R139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Taniguchi T, Yamamoto K, Ohmoto N, et al. Effects of propofol on hemodynamic and inflammatory responses to endotoxemia in rats. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 1101–1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fong Y, Matthews DE, He W, et al. Whole body and splanchnic leucine, phenylalanine, and glucose kinetics during endotoxemia in humans. Am J Physiol 1994; 266: R419–R425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kramer BW, Kramer S, Ikegami M, et al. Injury, inflammation, and remodeling in fetal sheep lung after intra-amniotic endotoxin. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2002; 283: L452–L459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Davies JK, Shikes RH, Sze CI, et al. Histologic inflammation in the maternal and fetal compartments in a rabbit model of acute intra-amniotic infection. Am J Obst Gynecol 2000; 183: 1088–1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.McKenna S, Eckman M, Parker A, et al. Perinatal endotoxemia induces sustained hepatic COX-2 expression through an NFκB-dependent mechanism. J Innate Immun 2016; 8: 386–399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kinoshita M, Uchida T, Sato A, et al. Characterization of two F4/80-positive Kupffer cell subsets by their function and phenotype in mice. J Hepatol 2010; 53: 903–910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mizgerd JP, Spieker MR, Doerschuk CM. Early response cytokines and innate immunity: essential roles for TNF receptor 1 and type I IL-1 receptor during Escherichia coli pneumonia in mice. J Immunol 2001; 166: 4042–4048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Christian F, Smith EL, Carmody RJ. The regulation of NF-κB subunits by phosphorylation. Cells 2016; 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lu YC, Yeh WC, Ohashi PS. LPS/TLR4 signal transduction pathway. Cytokine 2008; 42: 145–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Papa S, Bubici C, Zazzeroni F, et al. Mechanisms of liver disease: cross-talk between the NF-kappaB and JNK pathways. Biol Chem 2009; 390: 965–976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rowell DL, Eckmann L, Dwinell MB, et al. Human hepatocytes express an array of proinflammatory cytokines after agonist stimulation or bacterial invasion. Am J Physiol 1997; 273: G322– G332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Young RS, Yagel SK, Towfighi J. Systemic and neuropathologic effects of E. coli endotoxin in neonatal dogs. Pediatr Res 1983; 17: 349–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Nitsos I, Moss TJ, Cock ML, et al. Fetal responses to intra-amniotic endotoxin in sheep. J Soc Gynecol Investig 2002; 9: 80–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Garnier Y, Coumans A, Berger R, et al. Endotoxemia severely affects circulation during normoxia and asphyxia in immature fetal sheep. J Soc Gynecol Investig 2001; 8: 134–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Girard S, Tremblay L, Lepage M, et al. IL-1 receptor antagonist protects against placental and neurodevelopmental defects induced by maternal inflammation. J Immunol 2010; 184: 3997–4005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zarate MA, Chang EI, Antolic A, et al. Ketamine modulates fetal hemodynamic and endocrine responses to umbilical cord occlusion. Physiol Rep 2016; 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Vedder H, Schreiber W, Yassouridis A, et al. Dose-dependence of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) effects on peak response and time course of the immune-endocrine host response in humans. Inflamm Res 1999; 48: 67–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Moeniralam HS, Endert E, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Blunted cortisol response after administration of corticotropin releasing hormone in endotoxemic dogs. J Endocrinol Invest 1997; 20: 476–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jones SB, Romano FD. Plasma catecholamines in the conscious rat during endotoxicosis. Circulatory shock 1984; 14: 189–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wood CE. Insensitivity of near-term fetal sheep to cortisol: possible relation to the control of parturition. Endocrinology 1988; 122: 1565–1572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Roger T, Schneider A, Weier M, et al. High expression levels of macrophage migration inhibitory factor sustain the innate immune responses of neonates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016; 113: E997–1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Chelvarajan RL, Collins SM, Doubinskaia IE, et al. Defective macrophage function in neonates and its impact on unresponsiveness of neonates to polysaccharide antigens. J Leukoc Biol 2004; 75: 982–994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Mor G, Cardenas I. The immune system in pregnancy: a unique complexity. Am J Reprod Immunol 2010; 63: 425–433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Dijkstra F, Jozwiak M, De Matteo R, et al. Erythropoietin ameliorates damage to the placenta and fetal liver induced by exposure to lipopolysaccharide. Placenta 2010; 31: 282–288. D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ning H, Wang H, Zhao L, et al. Maternally-administered lipopolysaccharide (LPS) increases tumor necrosis factor alpha in fetal liver and fetal brain: its suppression by low-dose LPS pretreatment. Toxicol Lett 2008; 176: 13–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.McKenna S, Burey T, Sandoval J, et al. Immunotolerant p50/NFκB signaling and attenuated hepatic IFNβ expression increases neonatal sensitivity to endotoxemia. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 2210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Newnham JP, Kallapur SG, Kramer BW, et al. Betamethasone effects on chorioamnionitis induced by intra-amniotic endotoxin in sheep. Am J Obst Gynecol 2003; 189: 1458–1466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ireland DJ, Kemp MW, Miura Y, et al. Intra-amniotic pharmacological blockade of inflammatory signalling pathways in an ovine chorioamnionitis model. Mol Hum Reprod 2015; 21: 479–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gayle DA, Beloosesky R, Desai M, et al. Maternal LPS induces cytokines in the amniotic fluid and corticotropin releasing hormone in the fetal rat brain. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2004; 286: R1024–1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Toti P, Arcuri F, Tang Z, et al. Focal increases of fetal macrophages in placentas from pregnancies with histological chorioamnionitis: potential role of fibroblast monocyte chemotactic protein-1. Am J Reprod Immunol 2011; 65: 470–479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kumazaki K, Nakayama M, Yanagihara I, et al. Immunohistochemical distribution of Toll-like receptor 4 in term and preterm human placentas from normal and complicated pregnancy including chorioamnionitis. Hum Pathol 2004; 35: 47–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Pino RM, Bankston PW. The development of the sinusoids of fetal rat liver: localization of endogenous peroxidase in fetal Kupffer cells. J Histochem Cytochem 1979; 27: 643–652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.McKenna S, Gossling M, Bugarini A, et al. Endotoxemia induces IκBβ/NF-κB-dependent endothelin-1 expression in hepatic macrophages. J Immunol 2015; 195: 3866–3879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Sapolsky R, Rivier C, Yamamoto G, et al. Interleukin-1 stimulates the secretion of hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing factor. Science 1987; 238: 522–524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Spinedi E, Hadid R, Daneva T, et al. Cytokines stimulate the CRH but not the vasopressin neuronal system: evidence for a median eminence site of interleukin-6 action. Neuroendocrinology 1992; 56: 46–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Colotta F, Re F, Muzio M, et al. Interleukin-1 type II receptor: a decoy target for IL-1 that is regulated by IL-4. Science 1993; 261: 472–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Parameswaran N, Patial S. Tumor necrosis factor-α signaling in macrophages. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 2010; 20: 87–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kumagai T, Matsukawa N, Kaneko Y, et al. A lipid peroxidation-derived inflammatory mediator: identification of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal as a potential inducer of cyclooxygenase-2 in macrophages. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 48389–48396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Zhang JZ, Liu Z, Liu J, et al. Mitochondrial DNA induces inflammation and increases TLR9/NF-κB expression in lung tissue. Int J Mol Med 2014; 33: 817–824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 84.Colony PC, Neutra MR. Macromolecular transport in the fetal rat intestine. Gastroenterology 1985; 89: 294–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Shao B, Lu M, Katz SC, et al. A host lipase detoxifies bacterial lipopolysaccharides in the liver and spleen. J Biol Chem 2007; 282: 13726–13735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Fox ES, Thomas P, Broitman SA. Clearance of gut-derived endotoxins by the liver. Release and modification of 3H, 14C-lipopolysaccharide by isolated rat Kupffer cells. Gastroenterology 1989; 96: 456–461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Mirkin BL. Maternal and fetal distribution of drugs in pregnancy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1973; 14: 643–647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Mimura Y, Sakisaka S, Harada M, et al. Role of hepatocytes in direct clearance of lipopolysaccharide in rats. Gastroenterology 1995; 109: 1969–1976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Treon SP, Thomas P, Broitman SA. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) processing by Kupffer cells releases a modified LPS with increased hepatocyte binding and decreased tumor necrosis factor-alpha stimulatory capacity. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1993; 202: 153–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Yao Z, Mates JM, Cheplowitz AM, et al. Blood-borne lipopolysaccharide is rapidly eliminated by liver sinusoidal endothelial cells via high-density lipoprotein. J Immunol 2016; 197: 2390–2399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Romero R, Emamian M, Wan M, et al. Prostaglandin concentrations in amniotic fluid of women with intra-amniotic infection and preterm labor. Am J Obst Gynecol 1987; 157: 1461–1467.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Romero R, Quintero R, Oyarzun E, et al. Intra-amniotic infection and the onset of labor in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obst Gynecol 1988; 159: 661–666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Romero R, Sirtori M, Oyarzun E, et al. Infection and labor. V. Prevalence, microbiology, and clinical significance of intra-amniotic infection in women with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obst Gynecol 1989; 161: 817–824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Rana SA, Aavani T, Pittman QJ. Sex effects on neurodevelopmental outcomes of innate immune activation during prenatal and neonatal life. Horm Behav 2012; 62: 228–236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Hodyl NA, Stark MJ, Osei-Kumah A, et al. Prenatal programming of the innate immune response following in utero exposure to inflammation: a sexually dimorphic process? Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2011; 7: 579–592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Innate Immunity are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES