TABLE 1.

Literature review of materials used for interpretation bias assessment or training.

Materials (Authors)	Population and age group	Description of Material	Development of Material
Summers and Cougle, 2018	Undergraduate female psychology students and women from the community (N = 41) with elevated symptoms of Body Dysmorphic Disorder	135 scenarios describing situations involving the risk of social evaluation or exposure to own appearance	Developed by the researchers.
Cardi et al., 2015	Women with anorexia nervosa (N = 28)	134 scenarios describing ambiguous situations involving the risk of social rejection	Adapted from Huppert et al., 2007; Hirsch et al., 2009; Hayes et al., 2010
Cardi et al., 2017	Women with anorexia nervosa (n = 35) and healthy controls (n = 30)	12 scenarios describing ambiguous situations involving the risk of social rejection	Adapted from Huppert et al., 2007; Hayes et al., 2010 Research team (4 individuals) independently chose subgroup of sentences with greatest potential of being interpreted in positive or negative way.
Turton et al., 2018	Women with anorexia nervosa (N = 55)	110 scenarios describing ambiguous situations involving the risk of social rejection	Adapted from Huppert et al., 2007; Hirsch et al., 2009; Hayes et al., 2010; Cardi et al., 2015
Matheson et al., 2018	Female undergraduates (N = 123)	87 scenarios describing appearance-relevant ambiguous social scenarios	Training stimuli were developed by the researchers and informed by appearance-based feedback and rejection sensitivity scales (Tantleff-Dunn et al., 1995; Altabe et al., 2004; Park et al., 2010; Park, 2013). These were rated by women in a pilot study for relatedness to appearance and affective valence.
Cardi et al., 2019	Adolescent girls with anorexia nervosa (N = 24)	112 scenarios describing ambiguous situations involving the risk of social rejection	Adapted from Cardi et al., 2015 in collaboration with five adolescents with anorexia nervosa receiving inpatient care.