TABLE 2.

Classification performance of the different algorithms.

Algorithm	Correctly classified (%)	Incorrectly classified (%)	Algorithm	Correctly classified (%)	Incorrectly classified (%)
Ranking high-to-low spectral power			Ranking high-to-low spectral power
Window, moving			Current, moving
Total beta	83.3	16.7	Total beta	16.7	83.3
Low beta	58.3	41.7	Low beta	16.7	83.3
High beta	66.7	33.3	High beta	25	75
Peak beta	58.3	41.7	Peak beta	16.7	83.3
Window, resting			Current, resting
Total beta	83.3	16.7	Total beta	41.7	58.3
Low beta	66.7	33.3	Low beta	50	50
High beta	41.7	58.3	High beta	25	75
Peak beta	58.3	41.7	Peak beta	16.7	83.3
Window, moving-to-resting			Current, moving-to-resting
Total beta	41.7	58.3	Total beta	25	75
Low beta	25	75	Low beta	41.7	58.3
High beta	33.3	66.7	High beta	16.7	83.3
Peak beta	33.3	66.7	Peak beta	16.7	83.3
			Ranking low-to-high spectral power
			Current, moving
			Total beta	66.7	33.3
			Low beta	66.7	33.3
			High beta	58.3	41.7
			Peak beta	66.7	33.3
			Current, resting
			Total beta	41.7	58.3
			Low beta	58.3	41.7
			High beta	33.3	66.7
			Peak beta	41.7	58.3
			Current, moving-to-resting
			Total beta	83.3	16.7
			Low beta	66.7	33.3
			High beta	41.7	58.3
			Peak beta	66.7	33.3

Best performing classifiers are set in bold and are also shown in Figure 5. Left part of the table using the therapeutic window for the actual ranking (larger window—higher ranking); right part of the table using the therapeutic current threshold for the actual ranking (lower threshold—higher ranking).