TABLE V.
AL Group (N = 17) | PL Group (N = 44) | P Value | R Value* | |
Baumann angle† (°) | ||||
Injured elbow | 69.3 ± 8.4 (57 to 84) | 74.6 ± 8.2 (61 to 98) | 0.035‡ | 0.30 |
Contralateral elbow | 69.5 ± 7.4 (60 to 83) | 71.0 ± 4.3 (61 to 80) | 0.438 | 0.14 |
Gain | −0.1 ± 6.3 (−11 to 17) | 3.6 ± 8.5 (−11 to 32) | 0.067 | 0.23 |
Carrying angle† (°) | ||||
Injured elbow | 11.3 ± 5.2 (4 to 22) | 7.2 ± 8.0 (−17 to 20) | 0.025‡ | 0.26 |
Contralateral elbow | 12.7 ± 4.8 (5 to 25) | 12.3 ± 5.7 (3 to 31) | 0.645 | 0.06 |
Loss | 1.4 ± 3.2 (-3 to 8) | 5.1 ± 8.5 (−9 to 32) | 0.238 | 0.17 |
Cosmetic factor, Flynn criteria (no. of cases) | ||||
Excellent | 15 | 19 | ||
Good | 2 | 15 | ||
Fair | 0 | 2 | ||
Poor | 0 | 8 | ||
Incidence of “excellent” or “good” ratings (% [no. of cases]) | 100% (17/17) | 77.3% (34/44) | 0.028‡ | 0.29 |
Elbow joint range of motion† (°) | ||||
Extension | ||||
Injured elbow | 5.0 ± 4.3 (0 to 15) | 2.1 ± 5.0 (−15 to 15) | 0.035‡ | 0.28 |
Contralateral elbow | 5.6 ± 4.3 (0 to 15) | 4.7 ± 5.6 (0 to 20) | 0.394 | 0.11 |
Loss of extension | 0.6 ± 1.7 (0 to 5) | 2.6 ± 5.6 (−5 to 29) | 0.017‡ | 0.33 |
Flexion | ||||
Injured elbow | 140.6 ± 2.4 (135 to 145) | 134.7 ± 7.6 (110 to 150) | 0.006‡ | 0.39 |
Contralateral elbow | 140.6 ± 2.4 (135 to 145) | 138.6 ± 4.4 (130 to 150) | 0.136 | 0.21 |
Loss of flexion | 0.0 ± 0.0 (0) | 3.9 ± 5.6 (0 to 20) | 0.005‡ | 0.38 |
Arc | ||||
Injured elbow | 145.6 ± 5.8 (135 to 155) | 136.9 ± 4.4 (110 to 155) | <0.001‡ | 0.44 |
Contralateral elbow | 146.2 ± 5.7 (135 to 155) | 143.3 ± 7.4 (130 to 160) | 0.114 | 0.20 |
Loss of arc | 0.6 ± 1.7 (0 to 5) | 6.8 ± 8.1 (−5 to 31) | <0.001‡ | 0.47 |
Functional factor, Flynn criteria (no. of cases) | ||||
Excellent | 17 | 27 | ||
Good | 0 | 8 | ||
Fair | 0 | 4 | ||
Poor | 0 | 5 | ||
Incidence of “excellent” or “good” ratings (% [no. of cases]) | 100% (17/17) | 79.5% (35/44) | 0.041‡ | 0.26 |
General evaluation, Flynn criteria (no. of cases) | ||||
Excellent | 15 | 12 | ||
Good | 2 | 14 | ||
Fair | 0 | 6 | ||
Poor | 0 | 12 | ||
Incidence of “excellent” or “good” ratings (% [no. of cases]) | 100% (17/17) | 59.1% (26/44) | <0.001‡ | 0.40 |
The r value represents the effect size of the Pearson correlation.
The values are given as the mean and standard deviation, with the range in parentheses.
Significant (p < 0.05).