Table 3b:
state | Δmj,4 | ΔG°j,4 | source | ΔG°’j,4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
12 | −1 | 13.77 | pK12,4 | 6.77 |
2 | 0 | 5.8 8.63 |
ΔG°6,4-ΔG°6,2 ΔG°12,4-ΔG°12,2 |
5.8 8.63 |
3 | 0 | 7.15 7.67 |
ΔG°7,4-ΔG°7,3 ΔG°12,4-ΔG°12,3 |
7.15 7.67 |
4 | 0 | 0 | reference | 0 |
6 | 1 | −5.6 | pK6,4 | 1.4 |
7 | 1 | −3.88 | pK7,4 | 3.12 |
11 | 1 | 0.47 | pK11,4 | 7.47 |
14 | 2 | −1.71 | ΔG°14,7 + ΔG°7,4 | 12.29 |
Table 3a:. pKa are obtained from [24]. Microstate j has one more proton than microstate k. ΔG°jk is the free energy difference between states j and k at pH 0 (eqn 2b). State IDs are given in Figure 1 and 3b. Table 3b: Δmj,4 is the change in the number of protons relative to state 4. ΔG°j4 and ΔG°’j4 are the relative microstate free energy at pH 0 and 7 respectively. Source: Where pKj,k is indicated equation 2b and table 3a are used; otherwise the ΔG°s listed are summed to generate the energy difference between the desired microstate and microstate 4 using the network in Figure 3b.The energy of microstates 2 and 3 are obtained from the sum of the free energies around the indicated loop using the path described and the resultant ΔG° is the average of the two paths. ΔG presented as unitless free energies where a unit change in ΔG yields a 10-fold population change.