Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2020 Feb 12;34(5):561–573. doi: 10.1007/s10822-020-00280-7

Table 3b:

Epik SM07 microstate standard state free energies

state Δmj,4 ΔG°j,4 source ΔG°’j,4
12 −1 13.77 pK12,4 6.77
2 0 5.8
8.63
ΔG°6,4-ΔG°6,2
ΔG°12,4-ΔG°12,2
5.8
8.63
3 0 7.15
7.67
ΔG°7,4-ΔG°7,3
ΔG°12,4-ΔG°12,3
7.15
7.67
4 0 0 reference 0
6 1 −5.6 pK6,4 1.4
7 1 −3.88 pK7,4 3.12
11 1 0.47 pK11,4 7.47
14 2 −1.71 ΔG°14,7 + ΔG°7,4 12.29

Table 3a:. pKa are obtained from [24]. Microstate j has one more proton than microstate k. ΔG°jk is the free energy difference between states j and k at pH 0 (eqn 2b). State IDs are given in Figure 1 and 3b. Table 3b: Δmj,4 is the change in the number of protons relative to state 4. ΔG°j4 and ΔG°’j4 are the relative microstate free energy at pH 0 and 7 respectively. Source: Where pKj,k is indicated equation 2b and table 3a are used; otherwise the ΔG°s listed are summed to generate the energy difference between the desired microstate and microstate 4 using the network in Figure 3b.The energy of microstates 2 and 3 are obtained from the sum of the free energies around the indicated loop using the path described and the resultant ΔG° is the average of the two paths. ΔG presented as unitless free energies where a unit change in ΔG yields a 10-fold population change.