Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 7;9:e56533. doi: 10.7554/eLife.56533

Figure 2. Biofilms deform their substrate by buckling.

(A) Morphological parameters δmax (maximum deformation amplitude) and λ (half max full width) computed from resliced deformation profiles. Dashed line indicates the baseline position of the gel surface. (B) Timelapse visualization of V. cholerae Rg biofilm growth (brightfield, top) with deformation (reslice, bottom). Dashed lines indicate biofilm position and size on the corresponding hydrogel profile. (C) Superimposition of these profiles shows the rapid deformation and the emergence of a recess at biofilm edges. Each color corresponds to the same biofilm at different times. (D) Time evolution of δmax shows a rapid increase after 6 to 7 hr of growth. (E) The dependence of δmax on biofilm diameter highlights a critical biofilm diameter dc above which deformation occurs. For D and E, each line color corresponds to a different biofilm. (F) Hydrogel strain field computed by digital volume correlation between 11 hr and 12 hr of growth. We superimposed the vector strain field with a brightfield image of the biofilm. For visualization purposes we only display data for the top right quarter of the biofilm shown in inset (dashed lines). E = 38 kPa. Scale bar: 10 µm for inset t = 0 hr in (B), else 20 µm.

Figure 2—source data 1. Deformation amplitude and λ as a function of time and diameter.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Biofilm diameter-dependence of δmax and λ.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A) Biofilm diameter-dependence of δmax. (B) Biofilm diameter-dependence of λ. Both δmax and λ linearly scale with the diameter d of the biofilm.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Hydrogel deformation field computed at different growth stages, superimposed with a brightfield image of the biofilm.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

Scale bar: 20 µm. The force field at each timestep is normalized by its maximum displacement, thereby showing relative deformations.