Table 5.
Study ID | Measure and protocol | Functional change |
---|---|---|
Karlsen et al. 2017 [28] (Denmark) | Changes in function were assessed three times during the stay using the deMorton Mobily Index (DEMMI), 30 s Chair Stand Test (30sCST)and Hand grip strength |
Results for subset of patient in this review unavailable. Results for all patients, including participants excluded from this review: DEMMI: Score improved by a mean of + 4.2 between test 1 and 3 30sCST: Score improved by a mean of + 1.2 between test 1 and 3 Handgrip strength unchanged |
Pitta et al. 2006 [34] (Belgium) | Quadricep Force (in Newton Metres) was recorded on day 3 and 8 | Median Quadricep force declined from Day 3 (98, IQR 79–126) to Day 8 (90, IQR 67–109) |
Ueda et al. 2016 [33] (Japan) | Changes in function were assessed at baseline and day 10 of admission using the Barthel Index (BI) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) |
Mean score calculated from average of both cohorts show that both BI and FIM scores declined during admission: BI: Baseline: 92.4 ± 12.9. Day 10: 68.9 ± 29.5 FIM: Baseline: 113.8 ± 13.5. Day 10: 97.1 ± 28.8 |
Villumsen et al. 2015 [39] (Denmark) | Changes in function assessed at admission and discharge by a physiotherapist using Timed Up and Go (TUG) and BI scores | TUG: Minority of participants (40.3%) performed better on discharge. BI Score: Majority of participants (73%) performed better on discharge |
All figures mean ± standard deviation (SD) unless stated
DEMMI De Morton Mobility Index, 30sCST 30 s Chair Stand Test, BI Barthel Index, QF Quadriceps force, TUG timed up and go