Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 15;54:102451. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102451

Table 2a.

Acceptability on various SUTAQ items by HCPs.

SUTAQ Items (score) Strongly disagree (1) Moderately disagree (2) Mildly Disagree (3) Mildly Agree (4) Moderately Agree (5) Strongly Agree (6)
1. Saving time 0 0 1 (1.47%) 4 (5.88%) 19 (27.94%) 44 (64.70%)
2. Access to specialist care 0 0 0 10 (14.70%) 19 (27.94%) 39 (57.35%)
3. Satisfied with recommendations 0 1 (1.47%) 1 (1.47%) 6 (8.82%) 21 (30.88%) 40 (58.82%)
4. Recommend to others 0 1 (1.47%) 0 6 (8.82%) 16 (23.52%) 45 (66.17%)
5. Not as suitable as regular face to face consultations** 7 (10.29%) 5 (7.35%) 7 (10.29%) 18 (26.47%) 22 (32.35%) 9 (13.23%)
6. Easier to get in touch with Addiction Specialist 1 (1.47%) 0 0 3 (4.41%) 25 (36.76%) 39 (57.35%)
7. Interferes with the continuity of the care** 11 (16.18%) 8 (11.76%) 8 (11.76%) 13 (19.18%) 19 (27.94%) 9 (13.23%)
8. Invaded my patient's privacy** 24 (35.29%) 7 (10.29%) 9 (13.23%) 6 (8.82%) 13 (19.12%) 9 (13.23%)
9. Trusted to work appropriately 0 0 0 9 (13.23%) 21 (30.88%) 38 (55.88%)
10. Made me Feel uncomfortable** 29 (42.64%) 15 (22.05%) 7 (10.29%) 8 (11.76%) 7 (10.29%) 1 (1.47%)
11. Concerned about level of Expertise of Specialists** 12 (17.65%) 7 (10.29%) 6 (8.82%) 8 (11.76%) 18 (26.47%) 16 (23.53%)
12. Certainly, be a good addition to my regular consultation 2 (2.94%) 0 2 (2.94%) 6 (8.82%) 17 (25%) 40 (58.82%)
**

Items 5, 7, 8, 10, 11 were suggestive of dissent; therefore the scores are inverted; thus, a low value implies a positive view towards these aspects of e-consult.