Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 19;4(5):601–607. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.05.004

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cross-sectional imaging from June 2013. A, Computed tomographic image of the abdomen and pelvis with contrast demonstrating slight enlargement of the prostate. B, C-11 choline positron emission tomographic (PET) image demonstrating no suspicious choline avidity in the prostate. C, Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET image demonstrating no suspicious FDG uptake in the prostate.