Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 30;5(40):25568–25581. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c02417

Table 4. Comparative Catalytic Performance of Different Catalysts for Selective Reduction of NO by CO.

catalysts temperature (°C) XNO (%) SN2 (%) reaction condition reference
CuOx/rGOc 350 23.8 100 1 vol % CO + 0.5 vol % NO in He this work
Cu/rGOr 350 87.6 95.2 1 vol % CO + 0.5 vol % NO in He this work
CuOx-PdOy/rGOc 350 61.1 95.1 1 vol % CO + 0.5 vol % NO in He this work
Cu-Pd/rGOr 350 91.7 100 1 vol % CO + 0.5 vol % NO in He this work
CuO 275 100 94 3.3 vol % CO + 0.7 vol % NO in He [47]
5CuAIPO4 400 48 100 1.5 vol % CO + 0.2 vol % NO + 0.65 vol % O2 in He [4]
5CuAIPO4 reduced 250 50 100 1.5 vol % CO + 0.2 vol % NO + 0.65 vol % O2 in He [4]
Cu–Al hydrotalcite 360 100 100 1 vol % CO + 1 vol % NO in He [48]
11.1CuO/γ-Al2O3 200 <60 0 10 vol % CO + 5 vol % NO in He [5]
4.9CuO/CeO2 200 <98 100 10 vol % CO + 5 vol % NO in He [5]
9.3CuO/CeO2 300 100 100 10 vol % CO + 5 vol % NO in He [5]
Pd–Cu/Al2O3 200 <30   1 vol % CO + 0.45 vol % O2 + 0.1 vol % NO in N2 [49]
Pd–Cu/CeO–Al2O3 200 100   1 vol % CO + 0.45 vol % O2 + 0.1 vol % NO in N2 [49]