Table 3.
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β coefficient | (95% CI) | P value | β coefficient | (95% CI) | P value | β coefficient | (95% CI) | P value | ||||
Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||||||
Glucose disposal rate (M), mg min−1 kg−1 | 0.008 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
Insulin sensitivity (M/I), 100 × mg kg−1 min−1 mU/L | 0.009 | 0.002 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.008 | 0.001 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.008 | 0.001 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
Il-6, ng/L | − 0.14 | − 0.28 | − 0.002 | <0.05 | − 0.16 | − 0.32 | − 0.01 | 0.04 | − 0.17 | − 0.33 | − 0.001 | 0.04 |
CRP, mg/L | − 0.02 | − 0.04 | − 0.01 | <0.01 | − 0.02 | − 0.03 | − 0.001 | 0.04 | − 0.02 | − 0.04 | − 0.002 | 0.03 |
Glucose disposal rate, insulin sensitivity, CRP and eGFR were log transformed before entering in the models. Model 1 was adjusted age and eGFR; Model 2: Model 1 + total energy intake, physical activity smoking, alcohol intake, BMI, CVD history and blood pressure; Model 3: Model 2 + antihypertensive and lipid lowering medication