Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 30;5(40):25947–25953. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c03336

Table 2. Comparison of Device Response Time with Reported CuFeS2 Nanocrystal-Based Photodetectors.

type of CuFeS2 nanocrystal photodetector rise time decay time references
Si/CuFeS2 photodiode 18 s 20 s ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 2235–224152
CuFeS2 photoconductor 5 min 3 min J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 696–70118
CuFeS2 photoconductor 30 s 30 s Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 7, 200005634
CuFeS2/ZnO photoconductor 1.4 s 1.6 s this work