Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 7;17(18):6513. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186513

Table A1.

Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) Checklist: Prediction Model Development and Validation.

Section/Topic Item Checklist Item Page
Title and abstract
Title 1 D; V Identify the study as developing and/or validating a multivariable prediction model, the target population, and the outcome to be predicted. 1
Abstract 2 D; V Provide a summary of objectives, study design, setting, participants, sample size, predictors, outcome, statistical analysis, results, and conclusions. 2
Introduction
Background and objectives 3a D; V Explain the medical context (including whether diagnostic or prognostic) and rationale for developing or validating the multivariable prediction model, including references to existing models. 2–3
3b D; V Specify the objectives, including whether the study describes the development or validation of the model or both. 3–5
Methods
Source of data 4a D; V Describe the study design or source of data (e.g., randomized trial, cohort, or registry data), separately for the development and validation datasets, if applicable. 6–7
4b D; V Specify the key study dates, including start of accrual; end of accrual; and, if applicable, end of follow-up. 6–7
Participants 5a D; V Specify key elements of the study setting (e.g., primary care, secondary care, general population), including number and location of centers. 6–7
5b D; V Describe eligibility criteria for participants. 6–7
Figure 3 and Figure 4
5c D; V Give details of treatments received, if relevant. n/a
Outcome 6a D; V Clearly define the outcome that is predicted by the prediction model, including how and when assessed. 8–12
6b D; V Report any actions to blind assessment of the outcome to be predicted. 9–12
Predictors 7a D; V Clearly define all predictors used in developing the multivariable prediction model, including how and when they were measured. 7–8
7b D; V Report any actions to blind assessment of predictors for the outcome and other predictors. 7–8
Sample size 8 D; V Explain how the study size was arrived at. 7–8
Missing data 9 D; V Describe how missing data were handled (e.g., complete-case analysis, single imputation, multiple imputation) with details of any imputation method. 7
Statistical analysis methods 10a D Describe how predictors were handled in the analyses. 7–8
10b D Specify type of model, all model-building procedures (including any predictor selection), and method for internal validation. 4–5, 8
Figure 1
10c V For validation, describe how the predictions were calculated. 8
10d D; V Specify all measures used to assess model performance and, if relevant, to compare multiple models. 8
Figure 2
10e V Describe any model updating (e.g., recalibration) arising from the validation, if done. 8
Risk groups 11 D; V Provide details on how risk groups were created, if done. 7
Development vs. validation 12 V For validation, identify any differences from the development data in setting, eligibility criteria, outcome, and predictors. 8
Results
Participants 13a D; V Describe the flow of participants through the study, including the number of participants with and without the outcome and, if applicable, a summary of the follow-up time. A diagram may be helpful. Figure 3 and Figure 4
13b D; V Describe the characteristics of the participants (basic demographics, clinical features, available predictors), including the number of participants with missing data for predictors and outcome. Figure 3 and Figure 4
13c V For validation, show a comparison with the development data of the distribution of important variables (demographics, predictors, and outcome). Table A2 and Table A3
Model development 14a D Specify the number of participants and outcome events in each analysis. 7–8
14b D If done, report the unadjusted association between each candidate predictor and outcome. 8–9
Model specification 15a D Present the full prediction model to allow predictions for individuals (i.e., all regression coefficients, and model intercept or baseline survival at a given time point). 10
15b D Explain how to use the prediction model. 8–12
Model performance 16 D; V Report performance measures (with CIs) for the prediction model. 11
Table 4
Model-updating 17 V If done, report the results from any model updating (i.e., model specification, model performance). 12–13
Discussion
Limitations 18 D; V Discuss any limitations of the study (such as non-representative sample, few events per predictor, missing data). 15
Interpretation 19a V For validation, discuss the results with reference to performance in the development data, and any other validation data. 13–14
19b D; V Give an overall interpretation of the results, considering objectives, limitations, results from similar studies, and other relevant evidence. 14–15
Implications 20 D; V Discuss the potential clinical use of the model and implications for future research. 14–15
Other information
Supplementary information 21 D; V Provide information about the availability of supplementary resources, such as study protocol, web calculator, and datasets. 16–18
Funding 22 D; V Give the source of funding and the role of the funders for the present study. 15

Items relevant only to the development of a prediction model are denoted by D, items relating solely to a validation of a prediction model are denoted by V, and items relating to both are denoted D; V.