Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 17;17(18):6786. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186786

Table 2.

List of global climate models (GCMs) considered in this study.

Model SSP1-2.6 SSP2-4.5 SSP5-8.5
BCC-CSM2-MR X X X
MRI-ESM2-0 X X X
NorESM2-MM X X X
EC-Earth3 X X X
* INM-CM5-0 X X X
* INM-CM4-8 X X X
MPI-ESM1-2-HR X X X
GFDL-ESM4 X X X
GFDL-CM4 X X

* Not included in Gävleborg county because of data error. Remarks: BCC-CSM2-MR: The Beijing Climate Center Climate System Model, Version 2-MR; MRI-ESM2-0: The Meteorological Research Institute Earth System Model, Version 2.0; NorESM2-MM: The Norwegian Earth; System Model, Version 2-MM; EC-Earth3: The European Consortium Earth System Model, Version 3; INM; CM5-0: The Institute for Numerical Mathematics Climate Model, version 5.0; INM-CM4-8: The Institute for; Numerical Mathematics Climate Model, Version 4.8; MPI-ESM1-2-HR: Max Planck Institute Earth System Model, Version 1.2-HR; GFDL-ESM4: The Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory’s Earth System Model version 4; GFDL-CM4: The Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory’s climate model version 4. SSP1-2.6: Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP) with emissions driven by sustainable practices to produce radiative forcing of 2.6 Wm−2 by 2100; SSP2-4.5: Shared Socioeconomic Pathways with an intermediate radiative forcing level following continued historical patterns of 4.5 Wm−2 by 2100; SSP5-8.5: Shared Socioeconomic Pathways with sufficiently high emissions to produce radiative forcing of 8.5 Wm−2 by 2100.