Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 14;10(10):e041936. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041936

Table 3.

Respondents perception of the governmental and governmental institutional-specific response to COVID-19 outbreak in Nigeria

Specific response Respondents COVID-19 response perception rating
Poor,
n, (%)
Average,
n, (%)
Good, n, (%)
Enforcement of stay at home, physical distancing, face mask and handwashing policies (N=492) 244 (49.6) 141 (28.7) 107 (21.7)
Management of isolation centres (N=482) 265 (55.0) 148 (30.7) 69 (14.3)
Management of treatment and diagnostic centres (N=477) 254 (53.2) 150 (31.4) 73 (15.3)
Communication and information about the epidemic (N=490) 129 (26.3) 116 (23.7) 245 (50.0)
Prevention messages from government (N=490) 146 (29.8) 130 (26.5) 214 (43.7)
Use of personal protectiveequipment by healthcare workers (N=484) 232 (47.9) 134 (27.7) 118 (24.4)
Availability of social and economic support from government (N=490) 406 (82.9) 53 (10.8) 31 (6.3)
Availability of social and economic support from religious bodies (N=486) 253 (52.1) 129 (26.5) 104 (21.4)
Availability of social and economic support from family and friends (N=487) 161 (33.1) 158 (32.4) 168 (34.5)
The readiness of the government to manage the epidemic (N=490) 321 (65.5) 102 (20.8) 67 (13.7)
Government management of the resources provided for the outbreak (N=488) 368 (75.4) 82 (16.8) 38 (7.8)