West et al. 2019 [33] |
36 Intraoral appliances with human enamel sample |
Day 10 |
0.097 µm vs. 1.495 µm |
Ionta et al. 2019 [37] |
256 Bovine enamel blocks |
Day 5 |
4.8 ± 2.5 µm vs. 4.8 ± 1.4 µm |
West et al. 2017 [43] |
33 Intraoral appliances with human enamel sample |
Day 15 |
1.60 µm vs. 5.03 µm |
West et al. 2017 [44] |
33 Human enamel specimens |
Day 15 |
5.75 µm vs. 23.75 µm |
Hove et al. 2014 [50] |
16 Intraoral appliances with human molar |
Day 9 |
14.5 ± 9.3 µm and 33.3 ± 7.4 µm and 0.4 ± 1.3 µm vs. 29.2 ± 10.5 µm |
Bellamy et al. 2014 [51] |
12 intraoral appliances with human enamel sample |
Day 15 |
2.03 µm vs. 15.53 µm |
Stenhagen et al. 2013 [53] |
16 intraoral appliances with molar sample |
Day 9 |
1.8 ± 1.9 µm vs. 26.3 ± 4.7 µm vs. 3.1 ± 4.8 |
Huysmans et al. 2011 [57] |
20 intraoral appliances with human enamel sample |
Day 5 |
data not clear or incomplete |