Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 8;17(18):6524. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186524

Table 4.

Multilevel logistic regression on the effects of social integration and establishing health records among internal migrants.

Variables Model 1
AOR (95% CI)
Model 2
AOR (95% CI)
Economic integration
Employment (ref. no) 0.955 (0.921–0.991) * 0.932 (0.860–1.011)
Having a local house (ref. no) 1.082 (1.047–1.118) *** 1.011 (0.917–1.114)
Structural integration
Organizational participation (ref. no) 1.618 (1.576–1.660) *** 1.515 (1.415–1.621) ***
Civil engagement (ref. no) 1.355 (1.320–1.390) *** 1.353 (1.270–1.441) ***
Local medical insurance (ref. no) 1.321 (1.283–1.361) *** 1.335 (1.241–1.436) ***
Sociocultural adaptation
Having local friends (ref. no) 1.118 (1.085–1.151) *** 1.140 (1.068–1.217) **
Self-identity
Settlement willingness (ref. no) 1.247 (1.204–1.291) *** 1.248 (1.144–1.362) ***
The regional development
Living in the developed regions (ref. the developing regions) 0.358 (0.203–0.632) **
Interaction between social integration and the regional development
Employment × Developed regions 0.960 (0.801–1.150)
Having a local house × Developed regions 1.227 (0.979–1.539)
Organizational participation × Developed regions 1.094 (0.938–1.275)
Civil engagement × Developed regions 1.082 (0.938–1.247)
Local medical insurance × Developed regions 1.014 (0.866–1.187)
Having local friends × Developed regions 1.201 (1.035–1.394) *
Settlement willingness × Developed regions 0.940 (0.761–1.161)
−2LL 8,108,071.1 810,684.8

Notes: In model 1, we added social integration and control variables. In model 2, we added regional development and the interaction term between regional variable and social integration based on model 1. AOR: Adjusted odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; LL: log likelihood; significance level: *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and * p < 0.05.