Table 3.
Observations on using nets and attitude toward using nets in future among index cases and neighbors sleeping in at-risk sites of malaria, Phu Yen province, Vietnam, 2016
| Observation at investigation time | Index cases (n = 110) (n, %) |
Neighbors (n = 197) (n, %) |
Total (n = 307) (n, %) |
POR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Own bed-nets or hammock with a net - Own untreated netsa -Own treated netsa |
57 (51.8) 33 (30.0) |
94 (47.7) 80 (40.6) |
151 (49.2) 113 (36.8) |
1.18 (0.74, 1.88) 0.63 (0.38, 1.03) |
| Total of untreated nets in total huts | 89 | 174 | 263 | |
| Number of huts had untreated nets (n = 180) | 17/71 (23.9) | 48/109 (44.0) | 65/180 (36.1) | 0.40 (0.20, 0.78) |
| Willing to use untreated nets at sleeping sites | 40 (36.4) | 81 (41.1) | 121 (39.4) | 0.82 (0.51, 1.32) |
| Total of treated nets in total huts | 13 | 41 | 54 | |
| Number of huts had treated nets (n = 180) | 4/71 (5.6) | 15/109 (13.8) | 19/180 (10.6) | 0.38 (0.10, 1.13) |
| Willing to use treated nets at sleeping sites | 10 (9.1) | 30 (15.2) | 40 (13.0) | 0.56 (0.26, 1.19) |
POR prevalence odds ratio, CI confidence interval
aMultiple responses possible