Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 15;20:760. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05483-9

Table 3.

Factors associated with a positive QFT result at visit 1 using different definitions of QFT positivity

Definition 1 Definition 2a Definition 3
(≥0.2 IU/ml) (≥0.35 IU/ml) (≥0.7 IU/ml)
QFT positive (n) total (n) Adjusted
OR (95%CI)b
QFT
positive (n)
total (n) Adjusted
OR (95%CI)b
QFT positive (n) total (n) Adjusted
OR (95%CI)b
Both countries
Total 1361 (68) 1988 1243 (63) 1968 1103 (57) 1951
HIV status
 HIV negative 1026 (72) 1417 1 942 (67) 1402 1 839 (60) 1390 1
 HIV positive, no ARV 288 (58) 496 0.5 (0.4–0.6) 258 (53) 491 0.5 (0.4–0.6) 229 (47) 489 0.5 (0.4–0.6)
 HIV positive & ARV 30 (55) 55 0.4 (0.2–0.8) 28 (51) 55 0.4 (0.3–0.8) 21 (40) 53 0.4 (0.2–0.8)
 Unknown 17 (85) 20 15 (75) 20 14 (74) 19
Zambia
Total 735 (62) 1180 669 (57) 1164 599 (52) 1150
HIV status
 HIV negative 529 (65) 808 1 484 (61) 797 1 435 (55) 788 1
 HIV positive, no ARV 176 (55) 321 0.5 (0.4–0.7) 158 (50) 316 0.5 (0.4–0.7) 142 (45) 314 0.5 (0.4–0.7)
 HIV positive & ARV 18 (49) 37 0.4 (0.2–0.8) 16 (43) 37 0.4 (0.2–0.8) 12 (34) 35 0.3 (0.2–0.7)
 Unknown 12 (86) 14 11 (79) 14 10 (77) 13
Region by TST prevalence
 Lusaka, high TST 249 (68) 369 1 234 (64) 363 1 217 (60) 359 1
 Urban, high TST 207 (63) 331 0.6 (0.4–0.9) 186 (57) 326 0.6 (0.4–0.9) 158 (49) 322 0.6 (0.4–0.9)
 Urban, low TST 205 (57) 357 0.5 (0.4–0.8) 181 (52) 350 0.5 (0.4–0.7) 164 (48) 345 0.5 (0.4–0.7)
 Rural, low TST 74 (58) 127 0.5 (0.3–0.9) 68 (54) 125 0.6 (0.3–0.9) 60 (48) 124 0.6 (0.3–0.9)
South Africa
Total 626 (77) 808 574 (71) 804 504 (63) 801
HIV status
 HIV negative 497 (82) 609 1 458 (76) 605 1 404 (67) 602 1
 HIV positive, no ARV 112 (64) 175 0.4 (0.3–0.6) 100 (57) 175 0.4 (0.3–0.6) 87 (50) 175 0.4 (0.3–0.6)
 HIV positive & ARV 12 (67) 18 0.7 (0.2–2.0) 12 (67) 18 0.7 (0.2–2.0) 9 (50) 18 0.7 (0.2–2.1)
 Unknown 5 (83) 6 4 (67) 6 4 (67) 6
TST prevalence
 High 366 (80) 460 1 338 (74) 457 1 298 (65) 455 1
 Low 260 (75) 348 0.7 (0.5–1.0) 236 (68) 347 0.7 (0.5–1.0) 206 (60) 346 0.7 (0.5–1.0)

aTable A1, additional file, presents unadjusted odds ratios, estimates for sex and age, and p-values

b Adjusted models also included sex, age and HH intervention (yes/no). All variables were simultaneously added to the regression models