Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 18;8(3):60. doi: 10.3390/toxics8030060

Table 3.

The glyphosate concentrations in human urine samples (average and maximum values) from the non-occupationally exposed studies (Table 2) compared to the EFSA ADI 1 using a 1% urinary excretion fraction 2.

Study Percentage of EFSA ADI [%]
Average Max
Soukup et al., 2020 [41] <LOQ (median) 1%
Connolly et al., 2018 [52] <LOQ (median) 1%
Parvez et al., 2018 [14] 2% (mean) 5%
Conrad et al., 2017 [38] <LOQ (median) 2%
Knudsen et al., 2017 [23] 1% (mothers, mean)
1% (children, mean)
2%
Mills et al., 2017 [55] 0.2% (mean) NR 3
Rendon-von Osten. et al., 2017 [54] 0.3% (mean) NR
McGuire et al., 2016 [36] 0.2% (mean) 1%
Jayasumana et al., 2015 [11] 53% 4
(control populations)
SAN endemic areas 49% (median)
non-endemic area 6% (median)
Krüger et al., 2014 [51] NR 3%
Hoppe, 2013 [33] <LOQ (median) 1%
Varona et al., 2009 [53] <LOQ (median) 87% 4
Curwin et al., 2007 [24]
(Non-farm family)
1% (father, GM)
1% (mother, GM)
2% (child, GM)
6%

1 The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) acceptable daily intake (ADI) allowance is expressed as the amount mass of glyphosate, per kilogram of body weight per day (mg/kg b.w./day). 2 AMPA have similar concentrations in environmentally exposed individuals (results not presented). AMPA has been stated to have a similar toxicological profile to glyphosate, and glyphosate reference values also apply to AMPA (EFSA, 2015). 3 Not reported. 4 These studies were investigating non-occupational exposures; however, both reported the inclusion of potentially occupationally exposed participants. Therefore, we cannot eliminate the possibility that the upper exposure levels might be influenced by occupational exposure sources.