Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 14;10:17280. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74466-2

Table 3.

Comparison of patients’ characteristics among the ALI and the SLI groups in patients who progressed to ALF.

ALI group (n = 5) SLI group (n = 18)
Sex (M: F) 1: 4 12: 6 n.s
Age (range) 63 (52–85) 59 (27–82) n.s
Etiology
AIH, DILI, HBV (acute, carrier, de novo), oral, undetermined 1: 1: 0: 1: 0: 0: 2 3: 2: 3: 4: 2: 1: 3 n.s
Type of disease
Acute: subacute: LOHF 1: 3: 1 4: 14: 0 n.s
Prognosis (deceased: liver transplantation: survival) 2: 2: 1 12: 6: 0 n.s
Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI)
T-Bil (mg/dL) 17.6 (8.4–26.8) 13.6 (10.5–16.7) n.s
AST (U/L) 407 (139–676) 1703 (785–2622) n.s
ALT (U/L) 524 (174–873) 2188 ( 1077–3298) p = 0.0188
Cre (mg/dL) 0.98 (0.06–2.04) 1.15 ( 1.66–0.67) n.s
PT-INR 1.58 ( 1.50–1.67) 3.36 (2.59–4.13) p = 0.0046

Wilcoxon/Kruskal–Wallis test was performed for comparison among continuous values. AIH autoimmune hepatitis, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, Cre creatinine, DILI drug‐induced liver injury, HBV hepatitis B virus, LOHF late-onset liver failure, Oral hepatitis due to oral infection, PT-INR prothrombin time international normalized ratio, SLI severe acute liver injury, T-Bil total bilirubin.