Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 22.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Sens. 2020 Apr 29;5(5):1419–1426. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.0c00307

Table 2.

Comparison of measurement results for the developed fluorescent-SERS dual-modal method with representative existing methods reported in the literature for detection of MC-LR.44–49

Sensing system Method Sensing principle Dynamic range (μg/L) LOD (μg/L) Ref.
TiO2 nanotube/molecularly imprinted polymers PEC current–time curve method 0.5 – 100 0.1 44
gold nanorod/antibody SERS SERS method 0.01 – 5.0 5.0×10−3 45
carbon nanotube/porous fibrous materials electrical current–time curve method 0 – 10.0 0.6 46
SERS tag/antibody SERS SERS method 0.01 – 100 1.4×10−2 47
gold nanocrosses FL plasmon–enhanced FL 0.02 – 16.0 7.0×10−3 48
magnetic particles ELISA electrochemical ELISA method 0.4 – 20.0 3.9 49
Cy3/aptamer/gold nanostar FL-SERS FL and SERS 0.1 – 50.0 0.50 for FL
0.77 for SERS		 This work

Note: PEC=photoelectrochemical; FL=fluorescence