Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 30;12:31. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2020.00031

Table 1.

Summary of non-classification approaches to dendritic spines shapes analysis.

No Year Reference Sample Microscopy Spines form representation (Figure 3) Preprocessing and feature extraction approach Number of features Software (+ provided,− not provided) Morphological features analysis approach Software availability
1 2016 Ghani et al. (2017) 7–10 day old mouse brain slices neurons (region not specified) Two-photon 2D projection from image series Histogram of oriented gradients (HOG), disjunctive normal shape models (DNSM), morphological features, intensity profile based features or their combination Varying, from 12 for morphological to 346 for DNSM features Custom (−) X-means clustering, number of clusters selected automatically using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC; =4) NA
2 2016 Bokota et al. (2016) 19–21 days in vitro hippocampal neurons Confocal 2D projection from image series The most often used morphological features according to literature data 11 (reduced to 6) Custom (−) C-means clustering (=10), average-linkage hierarchical clustering (=10), data dimensionality reduction by 2D principal component analysis (PCA) UR
3 2018 Luengo-Sanchez et al. (2018) layer III pyramidal neurons of the human cingulate cortex Confocal 3D triangular surface mesh Multiresolution Reeb graph Surface of a spine is modeled by 7 segments, which are presented as linked to each other ellipses. From 54 parameters used to describe dendritic spines, 36 reflect ellipses geometry and position and 18 describe more complex features, such as spine growth direction 54 Imaris for segmentation ($), custom software for feature extraction (+) Clustering by probabilistic model with Gaussian finite mixtures, number of clusters selected automatically using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC; =6) FA
4 2019 Kashiwagi et al. (2019) 18–22 days in vitro hippocampal neurons SIM 3D triangular surface mesh Segmentation of spines by multilevel thresholding based on Otsu’s method following geodesic active contour, combination of morphological features and high geometric features 10 (reduced to 5) Custom (+) Division into mushroom and non-mushroom spines using SVM classifier, mapping the trajectories of individual spines shape transitions in the feature space, data dimensionality reduction by 3D principal component analysis (PCA) FA
5 2019 Choi et al. (2019) 18–22 days in vitro hippocampal neurons SIM 3D triangular surface mesh Processing as in No4 with addition of 5 more features reflecting spines head and neck size 10 DXplorer (−) K-means clustering, coordinate plot, radar plot and 2D scatter plot with t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding NA
6 2019 Driscoll et al. (2019) CLARITY-cleared mouse brain neurons (region not specified) LSM Machine-learning based supervised spines detection n/d u-shape3D software (+) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering (=9), data dimensionality deduction by 2D principal component analysis (PCA) NA

Software availability—NA, not available; UR, available upon request; FA, freely available.