Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 16;21(8):1235–1244. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01231-7

Table 3.

Base case monetary estimates and robustness to alternative specifications

Base case No IV IV Fujiwaraa SWLSb Compound SWBc Sum scoresd EQ5D-3L tariff Mean income Increment 0.05 Increment 0.20
Coefficients
 Log income 2.201 0.495 1.103 2.633 2.417 2.255 2.197 Base case coefficients
 EQ-5D-5L 2.665 2.665 1.599 2.131 2.398 2.858 2.179
 ICECAP-A 6.234 6.234 3.740 7.488 6.861 5.881 6.234
Value in £
 1 QALY 30,786 112,336 36,431 20,988 25,498 32,141 25,487 43,149 31,717 29,031
 1 YFC 66,597 193,305 77,651 66,828 66,723 61,979 66,597 93,343 71,305 58,384
Rel. size 2.2 1.7 2.1 3.2 2.6 1.9 2.6 2.2 2.2 2.0

All reported coefficients significant on the 1% level

aIncome coefficient from Fujiwara et al. (2013) [26], other coefficients from rerunning regressions with rescaled SWB

bRescaled from 0 to 10, instrument passes under- and weak identification test

cUnweighted average of Cantril’s ladder and SWLS as SWB proxy, instrument passes under- and weak identification test

dEQ-5D-5L and ICECAP-A sum scores scaled from 0 to 1