Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 15;3(10):e2017348. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17348

Table 3. Autoregressive Panel Models Examining the effect of Training Condition on Outcome Variablesa.

Outcome bb (95% CI) βc
MITI
Relational
T1 to T2 0.57 (0.33 to 0.81) 0.36
T2 to T3 0.10 (−0.18 to 0.38) 0.06
T1 to T3 0.34 (0.06 to 0.61) 0.21
Technical
T1 to T2 0.23 (0.03 to 0.44) 0.20
T2 to T3 0.17 (−0.06 to 0.41) 0.13
T1 to T3 0.28 (0.04 to 0.51) 0.21
Percentage of complex reflections
T1 to T2 2.41 (−3.12 to 7.93) 0.07
T2 to T3 0.99 (−4.83 to 6.81) 0.03
T1 to T3 1.55 (−4.36 to 7.46) 0.05
Reflection-to-question ratio
T1 to T2 0.23 (0.15 to 0.31) 0.43
T2 to T3 0.15 (0.07 to 0.24) 0.30
T1 to T3 0.23 (0.15 to 0.31) 0.45
MKT-R
T1 to T2 −0.01 (−0.05 to 0.03) −0.04
T2 to T3 −0.05 (−0.09 to −0.01) −0.20
T1 to T3 −0.05 (−0.09 to −0.01) −0.21
HRQ
T1 to T2 5.72 (4.27 to 7.16) 0.51
T2 to T3 2.76 (0.95 to 4.57) 0.24
T1 to T3 6.23 (4.55 to 7.91) 0.54
MIKAT
T1 to T2 −0.32 (−0.94 to 0.31) −0.07
T2 to T3 −0.23 (−0.97 to 0.51) −0.05
T1 to T3 −0.40 (−1.23 to 0.43) −0.09
PKSCS
Knowledge
T1 to T2 0.21 (−0.09 to 0.52) 0.12
T2 to T3 0.12 (−0.27 to 0.51) 0.06
T1 to T3 0.17 (−0.22 to 0.57) 0.08
Skills
T1 to T2 0.26 (−0.02 to 0.54) 0.17
T2 to T3 0.18 (−0.11 to 0.47) 0.12
T1 to T3 0.21 (−0.08 to 0.50) 0.14
Confidence
T1 to T2 0.28 (−0.00 to 0.55) 0.18
T2 to T3 0.17 (−0.16 to 0.50) 0.10
T1 to T3 0.21 (−0.12 to 0.54) 0.12
MI self-efficacy
T1 to T2 −0.67 (−4.32 to 2.99) −0.02
T2 to T3 1.44 (−1.89 to 4.76) 0.05
T1 to T3 1.75 (−2.76 to 6.26) 0.06

Abbreviations: HRQ, Helpful Responses Questionnaire; MI, motivational interviewing; MIKAT, Motivational Interviewing Knowledge and Attitudes Test; MITI, Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity; MKT-R, Motivational Knowledge Test–Revised; PKSCS, Provider Knowledge, Skills, and Confidence Survey; T, time.

a

In all models, condition was coded as 0 for control and 1 for VSP.

b

Unstandardized point estimate of the effect size.

c

Standardized point estimate of the effect size.