Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 2;9(9):2017. doi: 10.3390/cells9092017

Table 1.

Diagnostic and prognostic significance of the L1 methylation status in cancer.

Cancer Type Methods Diagnostic Value (*) Prognostic Value Ref.
Breast cancer Pyrosequencing Normal tissues—92%,
IBC tissues—86%
L1 hypomethylation was significantly associated with decreased OS (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.17–4.09), decreased DFS (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.14–3.67), and increased DR (HR 2.83, 95 % CI 1.53–5.21) in younger (≤55 years) but not in older patients (>55 years) [54]
Pyrosequencing Normal tissues—64%,
IBC tissues—61%
- [55]
Hepatocellular carcinoma Bisulfite-specific PCR and DNA sequencing analysis Normal tissues—60%,
tumor tissues—34%
Patients with L1 hypomethylation had decreased median postresection TFS (22 months [95% CI: 13.3–30.7]) and OS (35 months [95% CI: 24.0–46.1]) compared to those with L1 hypermethylation (40 and 60 months, respectively) [56]
Pyrosequencing Normal tissues—68%,
tumor tissues—48%
- [57]
Normal tissues—57%,
tumor tissues—46%
- [58]
Esophageal cell carcinoma Pyrosequencing Normal tissues—82%, tumor tissues—64% - [59]
Normal tissues—79%, tumor tissues—63% L1 methylation was significantly associated with DFS (univariate HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.38–3.84, methylation level [quartile] < 56%; multivariate HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.06–3.05) and CSS (univariate HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.33–3.60; multivariate HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.12–3.08) [60]
Quantitative real-time MSP Normal tissues—90%, tumor tissues—78% Cumulative survival was significantly shorter for ESCC patients with L1 methylation level ≤ 78% than for those with > 78% (34 vs. 43 months) [61]
Colorectal cancer Pyrosequencing Normal tissues—77%, tumor tissues—57% OS was significantly longer in patients with L1 methylation level ≥ 65% [62]
MSP-PCR, pyrosequencing after assay validation - L1 hypomethylation was significantly associated with higher CRC-specific mortality (for 10% decrease in L1 methylation: HR 2.45, 95% CI 1.64–3.66) [63]
MethyLight assay - PFS, OS, and 5-year OPS were significantly shorter in patients with low L1 methylation than in those with high L1 methylation (HR 1.00 vs. HR 2.74 [95% CI 1.19–6.29]) [64]
Quantitative PCR - L1 hypomethylation was significantly associated with lower OS (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.03–2.75); the association was stronger in patients > 65 years (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.13–3.52) [65]
Gastric and colon cancers Pyrosequencing Colon: normal tissues—67%, tumor tissues—61%
Gastric: normal tissues—66%, tumor tissues—62%
- [66]
Gastric cancer Pyrosequencing Chronic gastritis—62%, cancer—52% L1 hypomethylation level (<51%) was significantly associated with shorter DFS and OS [67]
Lung cancer Pyrosequencing Normal tissues—74%, ADC tissues—67% Patients with low L1 methylation levels (19–69%) had significantly higher recurrence rates and shorter DFS compared to those with high methylation levels (74–81%) [68]
- L1 hypomethylation (<52%) was significantly associated with lower survival rates in patients with ADC stage I [69]
Bisulfite-PCR, pyrosequencing Normal tissues—70%, ADC tissues—63%,
SCC tissues—38%
L1 hypomethylation (≤58%) was independently associated with poor prognosis (p = 0.025) [70]
Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma Quantitative MSP-PCR - L1 hypomethylation (<50% vs. ≥70%) was significantly associated with higher risk of early disease relapse (OR = 3.51; 95% CI 1.03–12.00) [71]

Abbreviations: IBC, invasive breast cancer; CRC, colorectal cancer; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival; DR, distant recurrence; TFS, tumor-free survival; OPS, overall probability of survival; CSS, cancer-specific survival; PFS, progression-free survival; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; ADC, adenocarcinoma. *—Diagnostic value is considered according to L1 MI.