Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 9;9(9):2912. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092912

Table 3.

Praise and criticism of live surgery performed on body donors.

What Did You Like? What Did You Not Like? What Should Be Done Differently?
“Parallel surgical steps on body donor and patient.”
“Detailed presentation and explanation of the anatomical structures.”
“Simultaneous laparoscopy on both real patients and the body donor during the live surgery session was the highlight of the congress.”
“Too little time allocated to anatomical dissection and laparoscopy on the body donor.”
“The start of the anatomical presentation was too early, as many participants were not present yet.”
“Suboptimal transmission on video screens.”
“More transmissions from the anatomy operating room.”
“More time to combine anatomical demonstration with live surgery.”
“The videos, especially from the anatomy lab, should be made available to the participants.”
“Better scheduling of the anatomy block, so that more aspects can be shown.”
“Switch more frequently between live surgery and the anatomy lab.”