Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 21;12(9):2704. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092704

Table 2.

Accuracy of the classification algorithm with subsequent reduction in included m/z values.

RF Model #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9
Included variables
(m/z values)
all m/z values (n = 195) 1410.7
810.4
1406.7
865.4
878.5
1234.7
1220.7
1104.6
1410.7
810.4
1406.7
865.4
878.5
1234.7
1220.7
1410.7
810.4
1406.7
865.4
878.5
1234.7
1410.7
810.4
1406.7
865.4
878.5
1410.7
810.4
1406.7
865.4
1410.7
810.4
1406.7
1410.7
810.4
1410.7
Model Metrics
Prediction accuracy (CI95%) 0.906
(0.868–0.935)
0.906
(0.868–0.935)
0.903
(0.865–0.9328)
0.912
(0.875–0.941)
0.887
(0.847–0.919)
0.884
(0.843–0.917)
0.887
(0.847–0.919)
0.726
(0.674–0.775)
0.676
(0.622–0.727)
Sensitivity 0.947 0.929 0.929 0.929 0.894 0.882 0.894 0.781 0.686
Specificity 0.859 0.879 0.873 0.893 0.879 0.886 0.879 0.664 0.664
PPV 0.884 0.897 0.892 0.908 0.894 0.898 0.894 0.725 0.699
NPV 0.934 0.916 0.916 0.917 0.879 0.868 0.879 0.728 0.651
Validation Data Set: n =318 (ADC n = 169, SqCC n = 149)
Misclassifications, n (%)
ADC misclassified as SqCC 9 (5) 12 (7) 12 (7) 12 (7) 18 (11) 20 (12) 18 (11) 37 (22) 53 (31)
SqCC misclassified as ADC 21 (14) 18 (12) 19 (13) 16 (11) 18 (12) 17 (11) 18 (12) 50 (34) 50 (34)
Overall misclassified 30 (9) 30 (9) 31 (10) 28 (9) 36 (11) 37 (12) 36 (11) 87 (27) 103 (32)

ADC, adenocarcinoma; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; RF, random forest; SqCC, squamous cell carcinoma.