Table 3.
Association between baseline individual and household characteristics and part or no treatment in children
| Complete treatment (n=5396) |
Part treatment (n=8670) |
No treatment (n=2170) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number (%) | Odds ratio (95% CI)* | Number (%) | Odds ratio (95% CI)* | |||
| Age group (years) | ||||||
| 2 to <5 | 1214 (31·9%) | 1982 (52·1%) | .. | 608 (16·0%) | .. | |
| 5 to <10 | 2327 (34·4%) | 3559 (52·7%) | .. | 870 (12·9%) | .. | |
| 10 to <15 | 1855 (32·7%) | 3129 (55·1%) | .. | 692 (12·2%) | .. | |
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 2760 (33·3%) | 4415 (53·3%) | .. | 1108 (13·4%) | .. | |
| Female | 2636 (33·1%) | 4255 (53·5%) | .. | 1062 (13·3%) | .. | |
| Attends school | ||||||
| No | 1264 (30·2%) | 2239 (53·4%) | 1 (ref) | 686 (16·4%) | 1 (ref) | |
| Yes | 4132 (34·3%) | 6431 (53·4%) | 0·86 (0·79–0·93) | 1484 (12·3%) | 0·63 (0·55–0·71) | |
| Household | ||||||
| Socioeconomic status | ||||||
| Poorest | 1631 (33·9%) | 2619 (54·4%) | 1 (ref) | 563 (11·7%) | 1 (ref) | |
| Poor | 2878 (34·0%) | 4453 (52·6%) | 0·96 (0·85–1·09) | 1132 (13·4%) | 1·17 (0·99–1·39) | |
| Least poor | 887 (30·0%) | 1598 (54·0%) | 1·15 (0·98–1·34) | 475 (16·0%) | 1·67 (1·33–2·08) | |
| Large size | ||||||
| No | 2552 (32·6%) | 4235 (54·2%) | .. | 1033 (13·2%) | .. | |
| Yes | 2844 (33·8%) | 4435 (52·7%) | .. | 1137 (13·5%) | .. | |
| Remote | ||||||
| No | 4302 (32·8%) | 6981 (53·3%) | .. | 1812 (13·8%) | .. | |
| Yes | 1094 (34·8%) | 1689 (53·8%) | .. | 358 (11·4%) | .. | |
| Urban or periurban location | ||||||
| No | 4156 (34·4%) | 6317 (52·3%) | 1 (ref) | 1606 (13·3%) | 1 (ref) | |
| Yes | 1240 (29·8%) | 2353 (56·6%) | 1·27 (1·12–1·44) | 564 (13·6%) | 1·22 (1·03–1·45) | |
*
Multivariable logistic regression with robust SEs was done to account for household clustering. Odds ratios and 95% CIs are provided for the variables with the lowest Bayesian Information Criterion when all possible subsets of candidate predictors were modelled.