Table 2.
Scenarios from Walker et al. [3] | Scenarios from Pearson et al. [11] | Scenarios from Cabore et al. [12] | |
---|---|---|---|
Unmitigated epidemic (most severe)* | No action is taken and R0 is 2.3. | No action is taken and R0 is 2.7. | No action is taken and R0 is 1.7 overall (range of 1.5–1.8, depending on country). |
Social distancing | Population-level social distancing, i.e. the maximum reduction in the final scale of the epidemic that can be achieved through a uniform reduction in the rate at which individuals contact one another, short of suppression (for South Africa, e.g., this equates to a 37–48% reduction in social contacts). | Population-level social distancing, i.e. the maximum reduction in the final scale of the epidemic that can be achieved through a uniform reduction in the rate at which individuals contact one another, short of suppression (for all countries, this equates to a 20% reduction in social contacts). | Not modelled. |
Enhanced social distancing interventions (least severe) | Population-level social distancing as above, with individuals aged 70 years old and older additionally reducing their social contact rates by 60%. | Shielding of 60% of those aged 60 years old and older with a 60% reduction in transmission in addition to a 20% reduction in contacts outside the household and a 25% reduction in transmission from symptomatic individuals. | Not modelled. |
This is provided as a comparator ‘Reasonable Worst-Case Scenario’: it is considered very unlikely because, in reality, actions being taken to mitigate the epidemic would have an effect.