Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 4;12(9):2519. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092519

Table 3.

Multivariate analysis, using the compound age/test classification attribute for the DC and the VC.

Development Cohort
OS PFS
HR (95% CI) p-Value HR (95% CI) p-Value
ProteomicAgeClassification 0.68 (0.56–0.83) <0.001 0.85 (0.73–1.00) 0.047
FIGO (vs. IV) I/II 0.17 (0.07–0.42) <0.001 0.08 (0.03–0.21) <0.001
III 0.46 (0.28–0.75) 0.002 0.51 (0.30–0.84) 0.009
Histology (vs. serous) non-serous 1.53 (0.94–2.48) 0.087 1.71 (1.04–2.81) 0.034
Grade (vs. 3) 1/2 0.97 (0.62–1.50) 0.881 1.35 (0.88–2.09) 0.171
Residual Tumor (vs. yes) no 1.71 (1.06–2.77) 0.028 1.67 (1.05–2.64) 0.029
Validation Cohort
OS PFS
HR (95% CI) p-Value HR (95% CI) p-Value
ProteomicAgeClassification 0.81 (0.67–1.00) 0.045 0.83 (0.70–0.98) 0.030
FIGO (vs. IV) I/II 0.62 (0.19–2.01) 0.428 0.26 (0.07–0.94) 0.040
III 0.49 (0.28–0.84) 0.010 0.56 (0.32–0.96) 0.035
Histology (vs. serous) 0.88 (0.45–1.69) 0.695 0.79 (0.43–1.46) 0.458
Grade (vs. 3) 1/2 0.99 (0.56–1.76) 0.981 0.95 (0.58–1.54) 0.835
Residual Tumor (vs. yes) no 2.20 (1.33–3.65) 0.002 1.74 (1.03–2.95) 0.039