Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 16.
Published in final edited form as: Res Aging. 2019 Jul 14;41(9):868–890. doi: 10.1177/0164027519862745

Table 1.

Participant Characteristics at Baseline, Expressed as Mean (Standard Deviation) Unless Otherwise Specified

Whole sample N=16,089 Black n=2,249 Hispanic n=1,435 White n=12,385 aSignificant group differences
Baseline Memory (z-score composite) 0.00 (0.94) −0.31 (0.95) −0.28 (0.90) 0.09 (0.93) W>H=B
Age (51–104) 68.44 (10.15) 66.91 (9.84) 65.93 (9.76) 69.00 (10.18) W>B>H
Gender (% women) 59.20 65.10 61.30 57.90 B>H>W
Education (0–17) 12.47 (3.20) 11.60 (3.30) 8.86 (4.57) 13.04 (2.62) W>B>H
Wealth (ten thousands) 52.26 (132.33) 15.46 (40.34) 19.50 (36.94) 62.74 (147.60) W>H=B
Chronic disease burden (0–6) 1.81 (1.25) 2.02 (1.26) 1.61 (1.21) 1.80 (1.25) B>W>H
Stroke (% yes) 7.90 10.40 4.70 7.90 B>H>W
Depressive symptoms (0–8) 1.52 (2.00) 1.87 (2.08) 2.26 (2.45) 1.37 (1.90) H>B>W
Social participation (0–5) 1.72 (1.71) 1.94 (1.80) 1.46 (1.77) 1.71 (1.69) B>W>H
Private prayer (0–7) 5.14 (2.31) 6.18 (1.48) 5.64 (1.88) 4.92 (2.40) B>H>W
Religious attendance (0–4) 1.90 (1.44) 2.42 (1.34) 2.05 (1.36) 1.79 (1.44) B>H>W
Religious belief (1–6) 5.00 (1.38) 5.49 (1.07) 5.33 (1.06) 4.89 (1.43) B=H>W

Note. B = Black; H = Hispanic; W = White.

a

Comparisons using ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni (p < 0.006) and chi square (p < 0.05) tests