Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 21;8(9):1278. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8091278

Table 4.

Relative abundance of the most abundant genera in the different milk fractions (whole milk, fat layer and skimmed milk) from milk samples (n = 7).

Phylum/Genus Whole Milk Fat Layer Skimmed Milk
n (%) Relative Abundance 1 n (%) Relative Abundance n (%) Relative Abundance p-Value 2
Firmicutes
Staphylococcus 7 (100%) 12.10 (7.95–25.17) 7 (100%) 3.43 (1.23–16.61) 7 (100%) 9.61 (0.94–21.08) 0.53
Streptococcus 7 (100%) 2.31 (1.29–4.57) 7 (100%) 4.03 (2.54–18.01) 7 (100%) 2.66 (2.33–4.95) 0.59
Lactobacillus 7 (100%) 1.43 (0.78–2.14) 7 (100%) 1.87 (0.86–3.78) 7 (100%) 2.20 (0.46–3.55) 0.95
Pediococcus 7 (100%) 1.31 (0.87–1.84) 6 (86%) 1.38 (0.78–1.49) 6 (86%) 1.39 (0.66–1.85) 0.82
Bacillus 6 (86%) 0.34 (0.24–0.45) 4 (57%) 0.17 (0.00–0.29) 5 (71%) 0.33 (0.16–0.44) 0.39
Peptoniphilus 5 (71%) 0.35 (0.11–1.44) 5 (71%) 0.81 (0.40–1.27) 3 (43%) 0.00 (0.00–0.84) 0.56
Lactococcus 3 (43%) 0.00 (0.00–2.91) 4 (57%) 0.22 (0.00–6.98) 6 (86%) 3.57 (1.76–7.09) 0.33
Actinobacteria
Propionibacterium 5 (71%) 1.11 (0.12–4.98) 6 (86%) 6.52 (0.60–7.08) 6 (86%) 1.37 (1.14–2.35) 0.84
Corynebacterium 5 (71%) 1.11 (0.23–2.52) 3 (43%) 0.00 (0.00–0.84) 4 (57%) 0.48 (0.00–3.13) 0.57
Bifidobacterium 2 (29%) 0.00 (0.00–0.66) 3 (43%) 0.00 (0.00–0.33) 2 (29%) 0.00 (0.00–0.14) 0.84
Proteobacteria
Chondromyces 5 (71%) 2.51 (0.99–6.15) 5 (71%) 3.43 (1.23–3.80) 4 (57%) 1.31 (0.00–4.18) 0.79
Burkholderia 7 (100%) 0.77 (0.64–0.86) 7 (100%) 1.40 (1.06–1.60) 6 (86%) 1.03 (0.62–1.12) 0.04
Sphingomonas 5 (71%) 0.60 (0.12–3.32) 6 (86%) 0.94 (0.41–1.46) 4 (57%) 0.38 (0.00–0.75) 0.38
Hyphomicrobium 5 (71%) 0.30 (0.11–0.68) 6 (86%) 0.43 (0.30–0.62) 3 (43%) 0.00 (0.00–0.37) 0.28
Novosphingobium 2 (29%) 0.00 (0.00–0.21) 3 (43%) 0.00 (0.00–0.37) 4 (57%) 0.13 (0.00–0.52) 0.69
Azospirillum 2 (29%) 0.00 (0.00–0.18) 4 (57%) 0.38 (0.00–0.68) 4 (57%) 0.43 (0.00–1.47) 0.25
Chondromyces 5 (71%) 2.51 (0.99–6.15) 5 (71%) 3.43 (1.23–3.80) 4 (57%) 1.31 (0.00–4.18) 0.79
Bacteroidetes
Pedobacter 7 (100%) 0.61 (0.38–0.88) 7 (100%) 0.56 (0.42–0.83) 6 (86%) 0.72 (0.44–0.89) 0.96
Unclassified genera 7 (100%) 27.7 (23.86–31.55) 7 (100%) 31.81 (28.09–34.53) 7 (100%) 30.82 (26.71–35.82) 0.66

1 The relative abundance (%) of each bacterial genus is expressed as the median and the interquartile range. 2 Kruskal–Wallis rank tests.