Table 1:
RE-AIM indicators with the number and percent of unique studies (N=50) reporting each indicator. (#=number)
| Indicator | #(%) studies reporting |
|---|---|
| Reach | |
| Number of eligible participants exposed to recruitment | 22 (44%) |
| Sample size | 48 (96%) |
| Participation rate (as reported by the article authors) | 16 (32%) |
| Participation rate (number of studies that reported sufficient information to calculate standardized participation rate, using equation: sample size/ [1-(# ineligible/ # exposed to recruitment)*(# exposed to recruitment)] | 8 (16%) |
| Individual-level representativeness (Analyses conducted to examine comparisons between target population and study sample) | 2 (4%) |
| Description of broader target audience | 50 (100%) |
| Characteristics of target audience (e.g., gender, age, educational attainment, occupation, SES, behavioral outcomes) | 23 (46%) |
| Method to identify target population | 36 (72%) |
| Inclusion/exclusion criteria | 47 (94%) |
| Description of recruitment methods used | 44 (88%) |
| Efficacy/Effectiveness | |
| Weight change (weight loss in kg and/or percent of original body weight) | 45 (90%) |
| Proportion of sample that achieved ≥5% weight loss | 14 (28%) |
| Quality of life measure | 12 (24%) |
| Unintended negative consequences and results | 1 (2%) |
| Imputation of missing data | 20 (40%) |
| Mediators of weight change | 10 (20%) |
| Moderators of weight change | 17 (34%) |
| Adoption | |
| Number of eligible and invited sites | 2 (4%) |
| Number of participating sites | 32 (64%) |
| Site participation rate | 1 (2%) |
| Description of intervention setting | 40 (80%) |
| Setting representativeness (comparisons of targeted sites and study sites) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Method to identify and engage intervention setting | 17 (34%) |
| Number of staff eligible and invited to participate in intervention delivery | 2 (4%) |
| Number of staff participating in intervention delivery | 23 (46%) |
| Level of expertise of the delivery agent(s) | 42 (84%) |
| Implementation | |
| Statement of theories or principles used to develop intervention | 27 (54%) |
| Intervention duration | 47 (94%) |
| Description of encounters with participants during intervention (intervention number, timing, and/or duration of contacts) | 44 (88%) |
| Extent intervention protocol was delivered as intended | 0 (0.0%) |
| Consistency of implementation across study sites | 2 (4%) |
| Cost | |
| Cost of recruitment | 1 (2%) |
| Start-up costs | 4 (8%) |
| Ongoing cost of intervention delivery | 18 (36%) |
| Cost benefit or cost-effectiveness | 4 (8%) |
| Maintenance | |
| Weight outcome assessed at one or more points post-intervention | 17 (34%) |
| Participant attrition during follow-up period | 16 (32%) |
| Description of program continuation/institutionalization (continuation of program activities after completion of the research study or program institutionalization) | 10 (20%) |