Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 21;12(9):2362. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092362

Table 4.

Selected studies for therapy of uveal melanoma.

Study Study Type N Arms (n) ORR (%) DCR (%) PFS (mo) OS (mo)
Luke et al. 2013 [172] Multicenter, retrospective 39 Ipilimumab 2.6 46 - 9.6
Piulats et al. 2014 [173] Phase 2 32 Ipilimumab 6.45 50 NS NS
Carvajal et al. 2014 [169] Phase 2 101 Selumetinib (50)
Chemotherapy (51)
14
0
NS 3.7
1.6
11.8
9.1
Zimmer et al. 2015 [174] Phase 2 53 Ipilimumab 0 47 2.8 6.8
Joshua et al. 2015 [175] Phase 2 11 Tremelimumab 0 - 2.9 12.8
Shoushtari et al. 2016 [171] Phase 2 39 Trametinib (18)
Trametinib + GSK2141795 a (21)
5.5
4.8
NS 3.6
3.6
NS
Tsai et al. 2016 [176] Multicenter, retrospective 58 Pembrolizumab (40)
Nivolumab (16)
Atezolizumab (2)
3 10 2.7 9.5
Piulats et al. 2017 [177] Phase 2 19 Nivolumab + Ipilimumab 15.8 63.2 4.99 NR
Scheulen et al. 2017 [178] Phase 2 118 Sorafenib 1.7 66.1 5.5 14.8
Patel et al. 2017 [179] Phase 2 31 Glembatumumab Vedotin b 6 61 3.2 11.8
Mignard et al. 2018 [138] Multicenter, Retrospective 100 Ipilimumab (63)
Nivolumab or
Pembrolizumab (37)
0 32 - 13.38
Carvajal et al. 2018 [170] Phase 3 129 Selumetinib + Dacarbazine (97)
Placebo + Dacarbazine (32)
3
0
NS 2.8
1.8
NS
Sato et al. 2018 [180] Phase 1/2 19 Tebentafusp c 10.5 d - - NR

Abbreviations: ORR, overall response rate; DCR, disease control rate; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; NS, not specified; NR, not reached. a AKT inhibitor; b monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate against NMB; c bispecific protein IMCgp100; d minor responses in 4 patients.