Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 24;9(9):2724. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092724

Table 2.

Characteristics of the studies evaluating intranasal dexmedetomidine versus current available sedative agents.

Author Year Intervention Dose No. of Patients Age Procedure/
Intervention
Sedation’s Success Adverse Events
Behrle et al. [91] 2017 IN Dex II
vs.
intravenous sedative medications
3 µg/kg Dex
vs. Midazolam, Propofol, Pentobarbital, Ketamine
109 vs. 690 6 months–18 years Non-invasive procedures 92%
(with 39% receiving in Midazolam for sedation ≥ 45 min)
Not significant
Li et al. [92] 2020 IN Dex II
vs.
Oral Chloral Hydrate
1–3 µg/kg
Dex
720 ≤4 years Ophthalmic examination, transthoracic echocardiograph, auditory brainstem response testing, CT III and MRI IV imaging Higher success rate in the first group (RR 1.12) Lower incidence of nausea and vomiting in the IN Dex II group
25 to 80 mg/kg
Chloral Idrate
Zhang et al. [93] 2015 Two rescue doses of IN Dex II
vs.
second oral dose of Chloral Hydrate
after 50 mg of oral Chloral Hydrate
1 and 2 µg/kg
Dex
150 1–6 months MRI IV 94% and 98% in the IN Dex groups None
25 mg/kg
Chloral Idrate
Ghai et al. [94] 2017 IN Dex II
vs.
Oral Midazolam
2.5 µg/kg
Dex
59 6 years IV cannulation
CT III scan
67% vs. 24% achieved a Ramsey Sedation Score higher than 4 None
0.5 mg/kg Midazolam
Mukherjee et al. [95] 2015 IN Dex II
vs.
IN I Clonidine
before Sevoflurane anesthesia
1 µg/kg
Dex
80 3–7 years Preoperative sedation Emergence agitation was lower in the first group Nausea and vomiting (no statistical differences between the 2 cohorts)
4 µg/kg
Clonidine

I, Intranasal = IN, II, Intranasal dexmedetomidine = IN DEX, III, Computed tomography = CT, IV, Magnetic resonance imaging = MRI.