Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 16;20:627. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03326-8

Table 1.

Study characteristics and risk of bias assessment

Author (year), country Objective studied Mean Age Mean Gestational age Study design Recent Transfusion (< 6 months) Hemoglobin genotype (number of participants) Sample size Diagnostic method Diagnostic criteria Participants with IDA Prevalence Bias
Akinyanju et al. (1987), Nigeria [13] 1,3 22.8 NA Randomized control trial None

SS (11)

SC (3)

14 Bone marrow iron stain

Grade

0–1/5

3 21.43 ± 4.49

Selection bias: unclear

Reporting bias: unclear

Performance bias: unclear

Detection bias: unclear

Attrition bias: Low

Anderson et al. (1972), Jamaica [22] 1 25.27 16.93 Cross sectional study Nonea

SS (7)

SC (6)

S-thalassemia (2)

15

Bone marrow iron stain

Serum iron

TIBCb

Grade

0–1/3

< 50 ng/dl

< 240 μg/dl

10

1

1

66.67 ± 15.94

6.67 ± 0.87

6.67 ± 0.87

Fair
Oluboyede et al. (1980), Nigeria [14] 1 NA 23.3 Case control study None

SS (10)

SC (12)

22 Bone marrow iron stain

Grade

0–1/3

14 63.34 ± 12.78 Fair
Roopnarinegnh (1976), Spain [23] 1 NA 28.67 Cross sectional study None

SS (5)

SF (1)

6 Bone marrow iron stain

Negative &

weakly positive

5 83.33 ± 25.04 Fair
Aken’ova et al. (1977), Nigeria [24] 1 NA NA Cross sectional study NA SS 10

Serum ferritin

Serum iron

< 150 ng/dl

< 50 ng/dl

3

3

30 ± 8.52

30 ± 8.52

Fair

aThree patients had been transfused at least once; 5 years, 3 years and 6 months prior to the pregnancy, bTotal iron binding capacity, NA: not provided in study, IDA; iron deficiency anaemia, SS; Haemoglobin SS, SC; Haemoglobin SC, SF; Haemoglobin SF, Prevalence is reported with ± confidence intervals