Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 15;20:343. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01484-9

Table 6.

Association of combined Ki-67 and Her2 expression with pT and pN stages in patients with non-metastatic gastric cancer estimated using univariable and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression

Ki-67 and Her2 expression Association with pT Association with pN
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Univariable testa
 Her2 negative and Ki-67 negative 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
 Her2 negative and Ki-67 positive 0.22 (0.06–0.76) 0.035 0.84 (0.45–1.58) 0.819
 Her2 positive and Ki-67 negative 0.14 (0.03–0.59) 0.012 0.62 (0.24–1.57) 0.404
 Her2 positive and Ki-67 positive 0.13 (0.03–0.51) 0.009 0.81 (0.37–1.78) 0.985
Multivariable test 1b Model 1 Model 2
 Her2 negative and Ki-67 negative 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
 Her2 negative and Ki-67 positive 0.14 (0.03–0.61) 0.044 1.08 (0.56–2.08) 0.673
 Her2 positive and Ki-67 negative 0.11 (0.02–0.64) 0.029 1.21 (0.44–3.34) 0.942
 Her2 positive and Ki-67 positive 0.07 (0.01–0.39) 0.025 1.48 (0.62–3.55) 0.429
Multivariable test 2c Model 3 Model 4
 Her2 negative and Ki-67 negative 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
 Her2 negative and Ki-67 positive 0.13 (0.03–0.64) 0.039 1.27 (0.65–2.49) 0.601
 Her2 positive and Ki-67 negative 0.07 (0.01–0.48) 0.015 1.64 (0.57–4.74) 0.706
 Her2 positive and Ki-67 positive 0.06 (0.01–0.37) 0.009 2.01 (0.80–5.00) 0.263

Significant associations are shown in italics

pT stage pathological tumor stage, pN stage pathological node stage, Her2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

aPerformed using univariable logistic regression

bPerformed using multivariable logistic regression with adjustment for age, sex, tumor location, length, and differentiation grade

cpN stage was additionally adjusted for in Model 3, and pT stage in Model 4