Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 16.
Published in final edited form as: Collabra Psychol. 2020 Aug 12;6(1):42. doi: 10.1525/collabra.267

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics

Study Country N Year Age Range Personality Scale Follow up Mean (Max) Diabetes % Base (Follow up) HBP % Base (Follow up) Heart % Base (Follow up)
BASE-II Germany 1,437 2009 21–84 BFI-S 4.17 (5) 7% (4%) 36% (15%) 10% (6%)
EAS U.S. 734 2005 69–99 IPIP-50  3.94 (11) 19% (17%) 66% (22%) 37% (15%)
ELSA U.K. 6263 2002 29–99 MIDI 3.89 (5) 8% (4%) 39% (11%) 18% (8%)
HRS U.S. 18,925 2006 25–105 MIDI 5.19 (9) 20% (8%) 55% (23%) 22% (12%)
ILSE Germany 478 1994 60–64 NEO-FFI 11.37 (13) 11% (4%) 42% (14%) 41% (32%)
LBC1936 U.K. 959 2006 67–71 IPIP 6.53 (12) 8% (7%) 40% (12%) 24% (13%)
LBLS U.S. 935 1994 30–97 NEO-PI-R 9.00 (9) 10% (58%) 46% (51%) - -
MAP U.S. 604 1997 56–97 NEO-FFI 8.41 (14) 14% (10%) 54% (30%) 10% (8%)
MAS Australia 860 2005 70–91 NEO-PI-R 5.81 (9) 12% (4%) 61% (35%) 35% (13%)
MIDUS U.S. 5,988 1994 20–75 MIDI 11.54 (19) 5% (12%) 14% (52%) 11% (11%)
NAS U.S. 820 1990 47–85 Goldberg 14.10 (26) 11% (5%) 41% (18%) 23% (13%)
OATS Australia 463 1997 65–90 NEO-PI-R 3.74 (9) 10% (3%) 52% (17%) 25% (7%)
ROS U.S. 1,326 1994 55–103 NEO-FFI 9.10 (23) 13% (11%) 45% (37%) 10% (7%)
SLS U.S. 876 2001 29–100 NEO-PI-R 6.98 (7) 18% 46% (30%) 72% -
WLS U.S. 10,560 1993 33–75 BFI 18.00 (18) 4% (13%) 23% (46%) 7% (19%)