Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 11;20:101174. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101174

Table 2.

Cigarette smoking and total serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) in fully adjusteda regression models among 928 African American (AA) men in Chicago 2013–2018 – logistic regression models including odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI)(Model 1) with outcome of PSA >4 ng/mL and linear regression models includingβ coefficient and 95% CI (Model 2) with outcome of total PSA (continuous).

Participant Characteristics Logistic regression models
Linear regression models
OR (95% CI) β (95% CI)
Cigarette smoking history
 Never 1.00 (Reference) 0.00 (Reference)
 0 to 1 pack-year 1.86 (0.84 to 4.12) 0.12 (−0.25 to 0.49)
 >1 pack-year 4.34 (1.73 to 10.9)** 0.52 (0.01 to 1.04)*
Cigarette smoking history
 Never 1.00 (Reference) 0.00 (Reference)
 Past 4.58 (1.83 to 11.5)* 0.53 (0.02 to 1.04)*
 Current 1.83 (0.83 to 4.05) 0.12 (−0.26 to 0.49)
Cigarette smoking intensity
 0–19 cigarettes per day 1.00 (Reference) 0.00 (Reference)
 20 or more cigarettes per day 2.00 (1.09 to 3.68)* 0.12 (−0.27 to 0.52)
Cigarette pack-years (continuous) 1.02 (1.00 to 1.04) 0.00 (−0.01 to 0.02)
Cigarettes per day (continuous) 1.02 (0.99 to 1.04) 0.00 (−0.02 to 0.02)

b Type 3 Analysis of Effect on the relevant cigarette smoking variable; χ2 p-value for logistic regression models and F-ratio p-value for linear regression models.

a

Adjusted for age (continuous), marijuana use, other current tobacco use including E-cigarettes, cigars, pipes, snuff, chewing tobacco, and hookah, marital status, individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status, self-reported health, previous cancer diagnosis, body mass index, hypertension medication (yes/no), health insurance type, timing of last prostate specific antigen test, timing of last prostate exam such as digital rectal exam, and visits to a doctor in the last 12 months (quintiles).

*

p-value < 0.05.

**

p-value <0.01.