Table 3.

Comparison of methodologies reported in existing literature

Method	Model used	Accuracy (%)
Wu et al. [10]	SEIR	95
Chintalapudi et al. [19]	ARIMA	93.75
Poonia et al. [20]	ARIMA	95
Gupta et al. [21]	ARIMA	70
Our proposed method	ARMA	99.93
	ARIMA	97.72
	BRR	92.94
	HW	95.93
	LRP	98.06
	LR	92.74
	RFR	88.44
	SVR	97.59
	XGB	89.42