Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 14;47(12):2866–2878. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04758-2

Table 2.

Standardized ß coefficients for the relationship between CSF p-tau and entorhinal, limbic, and neocortical [18F]flortaucipir BPND or SUVr over the total sample and stratified per disease group

Total sample
(n = 78)
SCD
(n = 25)
MCI/AD
(n = 53)
CSF p-tau CSF p-tau CSF p-tau
Entorhinal[18F]flortaucipir BPND 0.46 (p  <0.01) 0.43 (p = 0.07) 0.17(p = 0.17)
Limbic [18F]flortaucipir BPND 0.45 (p = <0.01) 0.59a (p = 0.01) 0.22 (p = 0.08)
Neocortical [18F]flortaucipir BPND 0.43 (p = <0.01) 0.54 (p = 0.02) 0.27 (p = 0.03)
Entorhinal[18F]flortaucipir SUVr 0.50 (p = <0.01) 0.59 (p<0.01) 0.16 (p = 0.21)
Limbic [18F]flortaucipir SUVr 0.47 (p = <0.01) 0.67(p = 0.00) 0.21 (p = 0.09)
Neocortical [18F]flortaucipir SUVr 0.43 (p = <0.01) 0.41 (p = 0.08) 0.26 (p = 0.03)

Standardized ß coefficients (significant in bold) from regression analysis with [18F]flortaucipir BPND or SUVr as the dependent variables and CSF p-tau as predictor.

Effects adjusted for age, sex, and time lag between LP and [18F]flortaucipir PET