Table 1.
The quality of RNA-Seq data.
| Sample | C1a | C2a | C3a | T1b | T2b | T3b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw reads, n | 45,397,848 | 49,030,928 | 46,502,552 | 47,276,996 | 48,213,416 | 49,043,910 |
| Clean reads, n | 42,956,812 | 46,805,200 | 44,444,718 | 45,851,248 | 46,560,438 | 46,745,492 |
| Clean bases, n | 6,443,521,800 | 7,020,780,000 | 6,666,707,700 | 6,877,687,200 | 6,984,065,700 | 7,011,823,800 |
| Q30 (%) | 93.92 | 94.06 | 93.83 | 93.91 | 94.08 | 94.12 |
| Total-mapped, n (%) | 41,654,953 (96.97) | 45,403,546 (97.01) | 43,042,554 (96.85) | 44,465,804 (96.98) | 45,142,364 (96.95) | 45,335,591 (96.98) |
| Uniquely-mapped, n (%) | 40,113,769 (96.30) | 43728,229 (96.31) | 41,463,802 (96.33) | 42,827,550 (96.32) | 43,460,062 (96.27) | 43,573,934 (96.11) |
C1, C2 and C3 represented the sample numbers of the control group, while T1, T2 and T3 represented the sample numbers of the experimental group.
a, b indicated libraries derived from the lung of goat in three biological replicates for the control and the experimental group, respectively.