Table 2.
Means and SDs of the esthetic values for the baseline profile image and the manipulated mandibular retrusion and protrusion images as perceived by the four raters' groups.
Images | Laypersons (N = 30) | GDPs (N = 30) | Orthodontists (N = 30) | OMF surgeons (N = 30) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Sig | Mean | SD | Sig | Mean | SD | Sig | Mean | SD | Sig | |
−13 mm | 27.32 | 21.57 | 0.000∗ | 11.50 | 12.74 | 0.000∗ | 7.46 | 5.70 | 0.000∗ | 29.70 | 16.21 | 0.000∗ |
−11 mm | 23.73 | 17.58 | 0.000∗ | 15.83 | 11.04 | 0.000∗ | 12.43 | 7.94 | 0.000∗ | 22.50 | 15.87 | 0.000∗ |
−9 mm | 41.41 | 26.04 | 0.000∗ | 35.89 | 21.33 | 0.000∗ | 29.43 | 8.72 | 0.000∗ | 44.05 | 13.91 | 0.000∗ |
−7 mm | 44.73 | 23.51 | 0.006∗∗ | 52.44 | 29.32 | 0.001∗∗ | 43.96 | 11.99 | 0.000∗∗ | 41.95 | 17.12 | 0.000∗∗ |
−5 mm | 73.77 | 21.37 | 0.996 | 82.28 | 12.72 | 0.983 | 79.71 | 12.11 | 0.000∗ | 72.15 | 24.19 | 0.890 |
−3.5 mm (baseline) | 69.61 | 22.46 | 77.36 | 12.38 | 64.79 | 13.36 | 78.68 | 11.90 | ||||
2 mm | 71.86 | 24.75 | 1.00 | 82.83 | 18.69 | 0.936 | 72.04 | 13.52 | 0.192 | 80.50 | 11.11 | 1.00 |
0 mm | 59.41 | 27.24 | 0.825 | 62.72 | 19.89 | 0.010∗∗ | 42.75 | 17.42 | 0.000∗∗ | 56.35 | 18.70 | 0.000∗∗ |
+2 mm | 33.00 | 21.75 | 0.000∗∗ | 29.78 | 17.50 | 0.000∗ | 24.68 | 8.90 | 0.000∗ | 32.70 | 12.78 | 0.000∗ |
+4 mm | 30.00 | 24.32 | 0.000∗ | 15.39 | 10.68 | 0.000∗ | 11.07 | 7.50 | 0.000∗ | 26.60 | 15.00 | 0.000∗ |
+6 mm | 23.64 | 25.10 | 0.000∗ | 6.22 | 9.56 | 0.000∗ | 5.61 | 3.84 | 0.000∗ | 13.50 | 13.20 | 0.000∗ |
∗Significance at P < 0.05 as a result of Tukey post hoc test. ∗∗First significance appeared compared to the baseline image.