Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 8;2020:2068961. doi: 10.1155/2020/2068961

Table 2.

Means and SDs of the esthetic values for the baseline profile image and the manipulated mandibular retrusion and protrusion images as perceived by the four raters' groups.

Images Laypersons (N = 30) GDPs (N = 30) Orthodontists (N = 30) OMF surgeons (N = 30)
Mean SD Sig Mean SD Sig Mean SD Sig Mean SD Sig
−13 mm 27.32 21.57 0.000 11.50 12.74 0.000 7.46 5.70 0.000 29.70 16.21 0.000
−11 mm 23.73 17.58 0.000 15.83 11.04 0.000 12.43 7.94 0.000 22.50 15.87 0.000
−9 mm 41.41 26.04 0.000 35.89 21.33 0.000 29.43 8.72 0.000 44.05 13.91 0.000
−7 mm 44.73 23.51 0.006∗∗ 52.44 29.32 0.001∗∗ 43.96 11.99 0.000∗∗ 41.95 17.12 0.000∗∗
−5 mm 73.77 21.37 0.996 82.28 12.72 0.983 79.71 12.11 0.000 72.15 24.19 0.890
−3.5 mm (baseline) 69.61 22.46 77.36 12.38 64.79 13.36 78.68 11.90
2 mm 71.86 24.75 1.00 82.83 18.69 0.936 72.04 13.52 0.192 80.50 11.11 1.00
0 mm 59.41 27.24 0.825 62.72 19.89 0.010∗∗ 42.75 17.42 0.000∗∗ 56.35 18.70 0.000∗∗
+2 mm 33.00 21.75 0.000∗∗ 29.78 17.50 0.000 24.68 8.90 0.000 32.70 12.78 0.000
+4 mm 30.00 24.32 0.000 15.39 10.68 0.000 11.07 7.50 0.000 26.60 15.00 0.000
+6 mm 23.64 25.10 0.000 6.22 9.56 0.000 5.61 3.84 0.000 13.50 13.20 0.000

Significance at P < 0.05 as a result of Tukey post hoc test. ∗∗First significance appeared compared to the baseline image.