Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 14;13:10453–10464. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S272553

Table 3.

Univariate and Multivariate Cox Regression Analyses of OS in 367 Enrolled ccRCC Patients

Covariates Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis
HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value
Age at surgery 1.016 (1.003–1.030) 0.017* 1.010 (0.997–1.025) 0.140
Sex (male vs female) 0.980 (0.698–1.376) 0.906
Invasion deep (T1/T2 vs T3/T4) 11.455 (7.979–16.444) <0.001* 1.332 (0.729–2.433) 0.351
Lymph node metastasis (N0 vs N1) 11.027 (7.438–16.346) <0.001* 2.055 (1.270–3.325) 0.003*
Distant metastasis (M0 vs M1) 10.347 (7.244–14.779) <0.001* 1.856 (1.118–3.082) 0.017*
pTNM stage (Ⅰ/Ⅱ vs III/Ⅳ) 14.517 (10.026–21.019) <0.001* 4.839 (2.338–10.015) <0.001*
ISUP grade (1/2 vs 3/4) 3.387 (2.366–4.849) <0.001* 1.798 (1.206–2.681) 0.004*
CD39 expression (low vs high) 1.782 (1.295–2.450) <0.001* 1.424 (1.022–1.984) 0.037*

Note: *p <0.05.

Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ISUP, International Society of Urological Pathology.