Table 3.
Correlation analysis between nuclear ENO-1/ MBP-1 expression and different Wnt signaling markers.
| Staining | Nuclear ENO-1/ MBP-1 | Membranous beta-catenin | GSK-3β[pS9] | Snail/slug |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuclear ENO-1/ MBP-1 | ||||
| Cc | 1.000 | 0.235 | 0.341 | −0.257 |
| p | – | 0.007* | <0.001* | 0.004* |
| n | 142 | 129 | 112 | 126 |
| Membranous beta-catenin | ||||
| Cc | 0.235 | 1.000 | 0.393 | −0.390 |
| p | 0.007* | – | <0.001* | <0.001* |
| n | 129 | 147 | 126 | 134 |
| GSK-3β[pS9] | ||||
| Cc | 0.341 | 0.393 | 1.000 | −0.076 |
| p | <0.001* | <0.001* | – | 0.419 |
| n | 112 | 126 | 140 | 116 |
| snail/slug | ||||
| Cc | −0.257 | −0.390 | −0.076 | 1.000 |
| p | 0.004* | <0.001* | 0.419 | – |
| n | 126 | 134 | 116 | 145 |
IRS of nuclear ENO-1/ MBP-1 was correlated to different Wnt signaling markers using Spearman's correlation analysis. Significant correlations are indicated by asterisks (*: p<0.05).
Cc: correlation coefficient, p: two-tailed significance, n: number of patients.