Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 6;5(10):1746–1752. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.07.030

Table 3.

Factors associated with patency loss of arteriovenous fistulaa

Parameters Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Age (per 1-yr increase) 1.03 (1.01–1.06) 0.02b 1.02 (1.00–1.05) 0.08
Female (vs. male) 1.27 (0.57–2.63) 0.54 1.21 (0.51–2.65) 0.65
DM (vs. without DM) 0.89 (0.39–1.88) 0.77 0.75 (0.31–1.70) 0.51
Resistance index at 1 wk after surgery of ≥0.65 (vs. <0.65) 3.17 (1.46–6.50) 0.005b 3.01 (1.28–6.97) 0.01b
BA-flow at 1 wk after surgery of <400 ml/min (vs. ≥400 ml/min) 2.02 (0.93–4.14) 0.07 1.56 (0.63–3.74) 0.33
Period from surgery to initial cannulation of ≤14 d (vs. ≥15 d) 0.86 (0.41–1.98) 0.71 1.41 (0.59–3.71) 0.45
Body surface area (per 0.1-m2 increase) 0.90 (0.76–1.07) 0.23
Diameter of RA < 2.0 mm (vs. ≥ 2.0 mm) 0.51 (0.08–1.68) 0.30
Diameter of cephalic vein < 3.0 mm (vs. ≥ 3.0 mm) 1.82 (0.80–4.91) 0.16
RA-flow before operation (per 1-ml/min increase) 1.00 (0.97–1.02) 0.69
BA-flow before operation (per 1-ml/min increase) 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 0.45
Arteriovenous fistula creation after dialysis initiation (vs. before) 0.75 (0.34–1.56) 0.45

CI, confidence interval; DM, diabetes mellitus; HR, hazard ratio; RA, radial artery; BA, brachial artery.

a

One patient had a basilic vein, not a cephalic vein, and an ulnar artery, not an RA.

b

P < 0.05.